An empirical perspective on pictorial lies

Theorists in the debate about how to define lying disagree whether it is possible to lie with pictures. At the same time, they agree that definitions of lying should be consistent with how laypersons use the term ‘lie’. This calls for an empirical perspective on whether ordinary usage allows for pictorial lies. The present paper provides some initial data on this question by reporting an exper-iment with 623 participants investigating layperson judgements about cases of insincere linguistic and pictorial communication. The results indicate that ordi-nary usage of ‘lie’ does permit pictorial lies.