The Humanities and Public Life. By PeterBrooks (ed.) with Hilary Jewett. New York: Fordham Univ. Press, 2014. 172 pp. $18.00 paper

The Humanities and Public Life. By Peter Brooks (ed.) with Hilary Jewett. New York: Fordham Univ. Press, 2014. 172 pp. $18.00 paper.The Humanities and Public Life is the ambitious beginning of a much-needed conversation on the practice of ethical reading, and the contributions of this practice to public life and law. The impetus for the book, Peter Brooks explains, was the unfathomable misreading at work in the "Torture Memos" issued by the Office of Legal Counsel in August of 2002. Indeed, one needs only look at the distortive and bad-faith interpretations of the Convention Against Torture and accompanying provisions of the U.S. Legal Code to be reminded of the critical role of reflexive, contextualized, and critical reading to legal practice (Cole 2009).To this end, Brooks has curated a collection of essays that reflect on the humanities' contribution to disciplined and interpretive acts of reading. The structure of the book reflects the organization of the spring 2012 symposium at Princeton from which it emerged. The symposium, like the book, consisted of three sections: "Is there an ethics of reading?," "The ethics of reading and the professions," and "The humanities and human rights." An essay by Judith Butler sets the conversation in motion, as she explores the humanities' contribution to public life, and the issue of why the humanities should be defended against assessments of its value that take its instrumentality or "impact" as key metrics (p. 12).Central to Butler's argument, and to the reflections that follow, is the humanities' role in facilitating ethical reading. For legal scholars like Patricia Williams, this ethics takes the form of sensitivity toward individuals who may be objectified or transformed by readings of them (p. 78). For scholars in the humanities including Butler and Charles Larmore, ethical reading demands "critical judgment" on the part of readers (p. 30) as well as consideration of an author's intentions (p. 52). And contributors in high-level administrative positions including Ralph Hexter and Michael Roth emphasize a practice of reading attentive to the students and faculty for whom they read (pp. 83, 95).The book's thematic division into sections that examine spaces of literary analysis, professionalization, and human rights discourse as sites for ethical reflection offers a useful, organizing framework. But a more rewarding reading takes each section as enactments of ethical reading on the part of its contributors, who thoughtfully engage with each other's writing while making their own practices of reading explicit. Indeed, during these moments, The Humanities and Public Life is at its best.Two examples of ethical reading highlight the relevance of this book for interdisciplinary legal scholars. First, Williams' reflection on three photographs taken in the aftermath of the 2010 earthquake in Haiti shows the ability of captions to not only transform what we see but also transform our ability to see justly. To illustrate this point, she discusses an image of the silhouette of a young woman with outstretched arms and upturned hands. At first glance, Williams' law students interpreted this picture as an act of supplication that elicited a compassionate response. But when Williams attached the caption "Looter" to the photograph, students perceived the woman differently. The subject of the image became a figure of criminality and greed (pp. 75-78). This exercise offers a powerful window into the interpretive possibilities that inhabit textual, visual-and, indeed, living scenes. …