HPB P48 Minimally invasive HPB surgery in the UK from consultant and trainee perspectives

Background This survey took a ‘'snapshot’’ of prevailing attitudes towards minimally invasive HPB surgery from a consultant and trainee perspective. Methods Between November 2020 and January 2021, two google surveys were emailed to all HPB tertiary centres in the UK. The questionnaire contained 33 and 31 questions respectively regarding minimally invasive practice and training. Results Thirty-five HPB consultants completed the survey. The most common indications for conversion were failure to progress (91.4%), excessive blood loss (85.7%), access issues (85.7%). The majority (78.8%) of HPB surgeons undertook minimally invasive distal pancreatectomy (MIDP). One consultant undertook minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy (MIPD), 48.4% declared not performing MIPDs due to uncertainty of its superiority. Eighty-five-point seven percent performed minimally invasive minor liver resection and segementectomy (MImLRS), 70.6% reported better outcomes with this approach; 28.6% of consultants performed minimally invasive major liver resection (MIMLR), 23.3% reported better outcomes with MIMLR. Half of HPB trainees did not have access to complex laparoscopic HPB procedures; 72.2% desired fellowship training. Conclusions MImLRS and MIDP are accepted approaches by most HPB consultants correlating with a perception that outcomes are better/comparable to open approaches, in contrast to MIPD and MIMLR. HPB trainees lack laparoscopic HPB exposure leading them to seek further experience with fellowships.