Back to Search
Start Over
A Comparison of Intensive Care Unit Physician Staffing Costs at the 3 Mayo Clinic Sites
- Source :
- Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 81:1457-1461
- Publication Year :
- 2006
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2006.
-
Abstract
- OBJECTIVES To determine the provider cost of administering intensive care unit (ICU) services, comparing 3 different staffing models for ICU coverage, and to compare the costs of using house staff vs nonphysician providers (NPPs). METHODS Data were collected on total staff composition and number of beds in ICUs from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2004, at the 3 Mayo Clinic sites: Rochester, Minn; Jacksonville, Fla; and Scottsdale, Ariz. Institutional or national average staff salaries were used to determine total staffing costs per ICU bed per year at each site. Medicare medical education reimbursements were also taken into account. RESULTS Costs per ICU bed for physician staffing were $18,630 in Rochester, $37,515 in Jacksonville, and $38,010 in Scottsdale. When NPPs were substituted for house staff, the costs per bed were $72,466 in Rochester, $61,291 in Jacksonville, and $49,909 in Scottsdale. Incremental costs per ICU bed using NPPs were $53,836 in Rochester, $23,776 in Jacksonville, and $11,899 in Scottsdale. CONCLUSION Use of residents and fellows in ICU staffing at a major tertiary health center is more cost-efficient than use of NPPs. This finding could have implications for the cost of physician services in nonteaching community hospitals and the methods by which care is provided.
- Subjects :
- medicine.medical_specialty
business.industry
Staffing
Physician services
Retrospective cohort study
General Medicine
medicine.disease
Intensive care unit
law.invention
law
Emergency medicine
Medicine
National average
Incremental costs
Medical emergency
Full-time equivalent
business
health care economics and organizations
House staff
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 00256196
- Volume :
- 81
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Mayo Clinic Proceedings
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi...........92d607ace93f1b0c2011f26d115cd02f
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.4065/81.11.1457