Back to Search
Start Over
Pilot-scale evaluation of micropollutant abatements by conventional ozonation, UV/O3, and an electro-peroxone process
- Source :
- Water Research. 138:106-117
- Publication Year :
- 2018
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2018.
-
Abstract
- The electro-peroxone (E-peroxone) process is an emerging ozone-based advanced oxidation process (AOP) that has shown large potential for micropollutant abatement in water treatment. To evaluate its performance under more realistic conditions of water treatment, a continuous-flow pilot E-peroxone system was developed and compared with conventional ozonation and a UV/O3 process for micropollutant abatements in various water matrices (groundwater, surface water, and secondary wastewater effluent) in this study. With a specific ozone dose of 1.5 mg O3/mg DOC, micropollutants that have high and moderate reactivity with ozone (O3) (diclofenac, naproxen, gemfibrozil, and bezafibrate) could be sufficiently abated (>90% abatement) in the various waters by all three processes. However, ozone-resistant micropollutants (ibuprofen, clofibric acid, and chloramphenicol) were abated only by ∼32–68%, 68–91%, and 73–90% during conventional ozonation of the selected groundwater, surface water, and secondary wastewater effluent, respectively. By electro-generating H2O2 or applying UV irradiation to enhance O3 transformation to •OH during ozonation, the E-peroxone and UV/O3 processes similarly enhanced the abatement efficiencies of ozone-resistant micropollutants by ∼15–43%, ∼5–15%, and ∼5–10% in the groundwater, surface water, and secondary wastewater effluent, respectively. In addition, the E-peroxone and UV/O3 processes significantly reduced bromate formation during the treatment of the three waters compared to conventional ozonation. Due to its higher efficiency, the E-peroxone process reduced ∼10–53% of the energy consumption required to abate the concentration of chloramphenicol (the most ozone-resistant micropollutant spiked in the waters) by 1 order of magnitude in the three waters compared to conventional ozonation. In contrast, the UV/O3 process consumed approximately 4–10 times higher energy than conventional ozonation. This pilot-scale study demonstrates that the E-peroxone process can provide a feasible, effective, and energy-efficient alternative for micropollutant abatement and bromate control in water and wastewater treatment.
- Subjects :
- Environmental Engineering
Ecological Modeling
Advanced oxidation process
02 engineering and technology
010501 environmental sciences
021001 nanoscience & nanotechnology
Bromate
Pulp and paper industry
01 natural sciences
Pollution
chemistry.chemical_compound
Waste treatment
Wastewater
chemistry
Water treatment
Sewage treatment
0210 nano-technology
Waste Management and Disposal
Effluent
Surface water
0105 earth and related environmental sciences
Water Science and Technology
Civil and Structural Engineering
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 00431354
- Volume :
- 138
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Water Research
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi...........8e596c5874df09719adb165b9ea8d265
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.044