OP0343 LONGITUDINAL ASSESSMENT OF MRI OF THE SACROILIAC JOINTS IN THE ASAS CLASSIFICATION COHORT: EVOLUTION OF DIAGNOSTIC FEATURES AND PREDICTIVE UTILITY FOR AXIAL SPONDYLOARTHRITIS

Background Follow up of the ASAS Classification Cohort (CC) indicated a high positive predictive value for the ASAS classification criteria derived from baseline patient and imaging data1. Moreover, diagnosis of axSpA was changed by the rheumatologist in only 11.2% of patients after 4.4 years. This has raised potential concerns regarding diagnostic ascertainment bias. Objectives To determine the evolution of MRI features of axSpA in ASAS-CC cases by central readers, whether this reflects diagnostic assignment by the rheumatologist, and the predictive utility of baseline MRI features of axSpA. Methods MR images were available from 108 cases in the ASAS-CC at baseline and follow up (mean 4.4 years) and also had a rheumatologist diagnosis at both time points. Eight readers from the ASAS MRI group recorded MRI lesions that comprised global assessment (MRI indicative of axSpA (yes/no), active and/or structural lesion typical of axSpA (yes/no) according to ASAS definitions), ASAS definition of positive MRI, and detailed scoring of lesions per SIJ quadrant (SPARCC SIJ method). MRI data from ≥2 readers and from the majority of readers (≥5/8) was used to calculate positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV). Results MRI was considered diagnostic of axSpA in 52/108 (48.1%) cases at baseline and in 47/86 (54.7%) diagnosed at baseline as axSpA by the rheumatologist. Change in MRI diagnosis was recorded in 10/108 (9.3%) of cases (2 from yes to no, and 4 from no to yes for axSpA) according to agreement by ≥2 readers and in only 3 cases according to ≥5/8 readers (Table 1). Change in rheumatologist diagnosis was recorded in 9/108 (8.3%), 2 of which had a change in MRI diagnosis. Baseline MRI lesions considered typical of axSpA had very high PPV for follow up diagnosis of axSpA (Table 2). Conclusion The infrequent change in diagnostic ascertainment of rheumatologists over follow up of the ASAS-CC is supported by this central reader evaluation of MRI scans. A positive MRI at baseline had very high PPV for a follow up diagnosis of axSpA. Reference [1] Sepriano et al. ARD 2016;75:1034-42 Disclosure of Interests Walter P Maksymowych Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Pfizer, Janssen, Novartis, Consultant for: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Boehringer, Galapagos, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB Pharma; Chief Medical Officer for Canadian Research and Education Arthritis, Xenofon Baraliakos Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Centocor, Chugai, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer Inc, Roche and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Pfizer, Merck Sharp & Dohme, UCB Pharma, Novartis, Consultant for: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Chugai, Janssen Biologics, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Galapagos, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Chugai, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Manouk de Hooge: None declared, Iris Eshed: None declared, Susanne Juhl Pedersen: None declared, Ulrich Weber Consultant for: Abbvie, Joachim Sieper Consultant for: Abbvie, Bohringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB., Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Bohringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Lilly, Merck, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB., Stephanie Wichuk: None declared, Denis Poddubnyy Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Consultant for: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, UCB Pharma, Joel Paschke: None declared, Robert G Lambert Consultant for: Bioclinica, Parexel, Abbvie, Mikkel Ǿstergaard Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Celgene, Centocor, Merck, Novartis, Consultant for: Abbvie, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, and UCB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, BMS, Boehringer-Ingelheim, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Hospira, Janssen, Merck, Novartis, Novo, Orion, Pfizer, Regeneron, Roche, and UCB