Back to Search Start Over

Determinants of Bioprosthetic Aortic Valve Degeneration

Authors :
Julia Mascherbauer
Jakob A. Kraiger
Carolina Donà
Diana Bonderman
Begüm Öztürk
Stefan Aschauer
Daniel Zimpfer
Georg Goliasch
Franz Duca
Klaus Knechtelsdorfer
Christian Nitsche
Christina Binder
Andreas A. Kammerlander
Laurin Schachner
Christian Hengstenberg
Source :
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. 13:345-353
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2020.

Abstract

Objectives The aim of the present long-term study was to assess the incidence and mode of valve hemodynamic deterioration (VHD) of bioprosthetic aortic valves, as well as associated factors. Background Modern definitions of bioprosthetic valve deterioration recommend the use of echocardiography for the assessment of transprosthetic gradients and valvular regurgitation. Methods A total of 466 consecutive patients (mean age 73.5 ± 7.5 years, 56.0% women) underwent surgical bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement between 1994 and 2014. Clinical assessment, transthoracic echocardiography, and laboratory testing were performed at baseline and follow-up. VHD was defined as mean transprosthetic gradient ≥30 mm Hg and/or at least moderate valvular regurgitation on echocardiography. Patient-prosthesis mismatch was defined as an effective orifice area indexed to body surface area ≤0.8 cm2/m2. Results Patients were followed for a median of 112.3 months (interquartile range: 57.7 to 147.7 months). Among patients with complete follow-up (n = 383), 70 subjects (18.3%; 4.8% per valve-year) developed VHD after a median of 32.4 months (interquartile range: 12.9 to 87.2 months; stenosis, n = 45; regurgitation, n = 16; both, n = 9). Factors associated with VHD by multivariate regression analysis were serum creatinine >2.1 mg/dl (hazard ratio [HR]: 4.143; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.740 to 9.866; p = 0.001), porcine tissue valves (HR: 2.241; 95% CI: 1.356 to 3.706; p = 0.002), arterial hypertension (HR: 3.022; 95% CI: 1.424 to 6.410; p = 0.004), and patient-prosthesis mismatch (HR: 1.931; 95% CI: 1.102 to 3.384; p = 0.022). By Kaplan-Meier analysis, elderly subjects showed faster development of VHD (age 80 years, 100.3 months [95% CI: 63.6 to 136.9 months]; p = 0.023). By multivariate Cox regression, age, diabetes, concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting, creatinine, and VHD (p Conclusions On the basis of echocardiography, every fifth patient developed VHD after surgical bioprosthetic heart valve replacement. VHD was associated with renal impairment, the use of porcine tissue valves, arterial hypertension, and patient-prosthesis mismatch. Patients younger than 70 years were not affected by faster VHD.

Details

ISSN :
1936878X
Volume :
13
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........85991b1ab0ee13788e1975e23b1c185a
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2019.01.027