Back to Search Start Over

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Switch in Borderline Resectable/Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

Authors :
Roberto Alva-Ruiz
Robert R. McWilliams
Michael L. Kendrick
Jennifer A. Yonkus
David M. Nagorney
Wen Wee Ma
Travis E. Grotz
Christopher L. Hallemeier
Rondell P. Graham
Lavanya Yohanathan
Thorvadur R. Halfdanarson
Sean P. Cleary
Amit Mahipal
Rory L. Smoot
Lindsey A. Gregory
Amro M. Abdelrahman
Mark J. Truty
Source :
Annals of Surgical Oncology. 29:1579-1591
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2021.

Abstract

Background Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is an integral part of preoperative treatment for patients with borderline resectable/locally advanced (BR/LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). The identification of a chemotherapeutic regimen that is both effective and tolerable is critical for NAC to be of oncologic benefit. After initial first-line (FL) NAC, some patients have lack of response or therapeutic toxicities precluding further treatment with the same regimen; optimal decision making regarding this patient population is unclear. Chemotherapy switch (CS) may allow for a larger proportion of patients to undergo curative-intent resection after NAC. Methods We reviewed our surgical database for patients undergoing combinatorial NAC for BR/LA PDAC. Variant histologic exocrine carcinomas, intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm-associated PDAC, and patients without research consent were excluded. Results Overall, 468 patients with BR/LA PDAC receiving FL chemotherapy were reviewed, of whom 70% (329/468) continued with FL chemotherapy followed by surgical resection. The remaining 30% (139/468) underwent CS, with 72% (100/139) of CS patients going on to curative-intent surgical resection. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were not significantly different between the resected FL and CS cohorts (30.0 vs. 19.1 months, p = 0.13, and 41.4 vs. 36.4 months, p = 0.94, respectively) and OS was significantly worse in those undergoing CS without subsequent resection (19 months, p Conclusion CS in patients undergoing NAC for BR/LA pancreatic cancer does not incur oncologic detriment. The incorporation of CS into NAC treatment sequencing may allow a greater proportion of patients to proceed to curative-intent surgery.

Details

ISSN :
15344681 and 10689265
Volume :
29
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Annals of Surgical Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........85012df1fc0fbb01e8395b882ec46e8f