Back to Search Start Over

Results and Clinical Utilization of Foundation Medicine Molecular Tumor Profiling in Uterine and Ovarian Cancers

Authors :
Kyle C. Strickland
Catherine H. Watson
Michael B. Datto
Michelle F. Green
Mary Katherine Montes de Oca
Shannon J. McCall
Andrew Berchuck
Matthew McKinney
Daniel Spinosa
Janice Wong
Christopher Hubbard
John H. Strickler
Rebecca A. Previs
Laura J. Havrilesky
Gloria Broadwater
Source :
Targeted Oncology. 16:109-118
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2021.

Abstract

Recent advances in next-generation sequencing have allowed for an increase in molecular tumor profiling. We sought to assess the actionability and clinical utilization of molecular tumor profiling results obtained via Foundation Medicine tumor sequencing tests in uterine and ovarian cancers. We performed a single-institution retrospective chart review to obtain demographic and clinical information in patients with uterine and ovarian cancer whose tumors were submitted to Foundation Medicine for molecular tumor profiling over a 7-year period. Alterations identified on testing were stratified according to the OncoKB database actionability algorithm. Descriptive statistics were primarily used to analyze the data. Tumors from 185 women with gynecologic cancer were submitted for molecular tumor profiling between 2013 and 2019. The majority of tests (144/185; 78%) were ordered after a diagnosis of recurrence. In 60 (32%), no actionable molecular alteration was identified. Thirteen (7%) identified an alteration that directed to a US Food and Drug Administration-approved therapy in that tumor type, while 112 (61%) had alterations with investigational or hypothetical treatment implications. In patients with any actionable finding, treatment was initiated in 27 (15%) based on these results. The majority of uterine and ovarian cancers (93%) did not have molecular alterations with corresponding Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments. Even in patients with a potentially actionable alteration, gynecologic oncologists were more likely to choose an alternative therapy. Further investigation is warranted to determine which patients with uterine and ovarian cancer are most likely to benefit from molecular tumor profiling and the ideal timing of testing. The potential to identify effective therapeutic options in a minority of patients needs to be balanced with the current limited clinical applicability of these results in most cases.

Details

ISSN :
1776260X and 17762596
Volume :
16
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Targeted Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........838f0f1d7e583b949157e04bddaf1d48
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11523-020-00785-z