Back to Search Start Over

Establishment of Quality Assessment Standard for Mammographic Equipments: Evaluation of Phantom and Clinical Images

Authors :
Byung Jae Cho
Jeong Mi Park
Hyo Keun Lim
Hak Hee Kim
Boo Kyung Han
Nariya Cho
Bo Kyoung Seo
Eun Kyung Kim
Jeong Hee Park
Mi Hye Kim
Eun Suk Cha
Yeon Hyeon Choe
Ji Young Kim
Yong Hwan Jeon
Ki Keun Oh
Hae Kyung Lee
Soo Young Chung
Sung Hoon Lee
Eunju Son
Hye Young Choi
Source :
Journal of the Korean Radiological Society. 53:117
Publication Year :
2005
Publisher :
The Korean Society of Radiology, 2005.

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to establish a quality standard for mammographic equipment in Korea and to eventually improve mammographic quality in clinics and hospitals throughout Korea by educating technicians and clinic personnel. Materials and Methods: For the phantom test and on site assessment, we visited 37 sites and examined 43 sets of mammographic equipment. Items that were examined include phantom test, radiation dose measurement, developer assessment, etc. The phantom images were assessed visually and by optical density measurements. For the clinical image assessment, clinical images from 371 sites were examined following the new Korean standard for clinical image evaluation. The items examined include labeling, positioning, contrast, exposure, artifacts, collimation among others. Results: Quality standard of mammographic equipment was satisfied in all equipment during on site visits. Average mean glandular dose was 114.9 mRad. All phantom image test scores were over 10 points (average, 10.8 points). However, optical density measurements were below 1.2 in 9 sets of equipment (20.9%). Clinical image evaluation revealed appropriate image quality in 83.5%, while images from non-radiologist clinics were adequate in 74.6% (91/122), which was the lowest score of any group. Images were satisfactory in 59.0% (219/371) based on evaluation by specialists following the new Korean standard for clinical image evaluation. Satisfactory images had a mean score of 81.7 (1 S.D.=8.9) and unsatisfactory images had a mean score of 61.9 (1 S.D=11). The correlation coefficient between the two observers was 0.93 (p

Details

ISSN :
03012867
Volume :
53
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of the Korean Radiological Society
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........80ed6b5f230b0af6a604ad4dcdb45613
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3348/jkrs.2005.53.2.117