Back to Search Start Over

Hyperbaric oxygen

Authors :
James K. Wright
Xavier A. Figueroa
Source :
Neurology. 87:1400-1406
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2016.

Abstract

Objective: First, to demonstrate that B-level evidence exists for the use of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) as an effective treatment in mild to moderate traumatic brain injury/persistent postconcussion syndrome (mTBI/PPCS). Second, to alert readers and researchers that currently used pressurized air controls (≥21% O 2 , >1.0 ATA) are therapeutically active and cannot be utilized as sham controls without further validation. Method: Review of published, peer-reviewed articles of HBOT prospective and controlled clinical trials of mTBI/PPCS symptoms. Results: Published results demonstrate that HBOT is effective in the treatment of mTBI/PPCS symptoms. Doses of oxygen that are applied at ≥21% O 2 and at pressures of >1.0 ATA produce improvements from baseline measures. Some of the recently published clinical trials are mischaracterized as sham-controlled clinical trials (i.e., sham = 21% O 2 /1.2–1.3 ATA), but are best characterized as dose-varying (variation in oxygen concentration, pressure applied, or both) clinical trials. Conclusions: Hyperbaric oxygen and hyperbaric air have demonstrated therapeutic effects on mTBI/PPCS symptoms and can alleviate posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms secondary to a brain injury in 5 out of 5 peer-reviewed clinical trials. The current use of pressurized air (1.2–1.3 ATA) as a placebo or sham in clinical trials biases the results due to biological activity that favors healing.

Details

ISSN :
1526632X and 00283878
Volume :
87
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Neurology
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........7e0ea5517c555137380116bb3e1f70b2
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1212/wnl.0000000000003146