Back to Search Start Over

On Assessing Trustworthy AI in Healthcare: Machine Learning as a Supportive Tool to Recognize Cardiac Arrest in Emergency Calls

Authors :
Zicari, Roberto V.
Brusseau, James
Blomberg, Stig N.
Collatz Christensen, Helle
Coffee, Megan
Ganapini, Marianna B.
Gerke, Sara
Krendl Gilbert, Thomas
Hickman, Eleanore
Hildt, Elisabeth
Holm, Sune
Kühne, Ulrich
Madai, Vince I.
Osika, Walter
Spezzatti, Andy
Schnebel, Eberhard
Tithi, Jesmin J.
Vetter, Dennis
Westerlund, Magnus
Wurth, Renee
Amann, Julia
Vegard, Antun
Beretta, Valentina
Bruneault, Frédérick
Campano, Erik
Düdder, Boris
Gallucci, Alessio
Goffi, Emmanuel
Haase, Christoffer B.
Hagendorff, Thilo
Kringen, Pedro
Möslein, Florian
Ottenheimer, Davi
Ozols, Matiss
Palazzani, Laura
Petrin, Martin
Tafur, Karin
Tørresen, Jim
Volland, Holger
Kararigas, Georgios
Publisher :
ETH Zurich

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has the potential to greatly improve the delivery of healthcare and other services that advance population health and wellbeing. However, the use of AI in healthcare also brings potential risks that may cause unintended harm. To guide future developments in AI, the High-Level Expert Group on AI set up by the European Commission (EC), recently published ethics guidelines for what it terms “trustworthy” AI. These guidelines are aimed at a variety of stakeholders, especially guiding practitioners toward more ethical and more robust applications of AI. In line with efforts of the EC, AI ethics scholarship focuses increasingly on converting abstract principles into actionable recommendations. However, the interpretation, relevance, and implementation of trustworthy AI depend on the domain and the context in which the AI system is used. The main contribution of this paper is to demonstrate how to use the general AI HLEG trustworthy AI guidelines in practice in the healthcare domain. To this end, we present a best practice of assessing the use of machine learning as a supportive tool to recognize cardiac arrest in emergency calls. The AI system under assessment is currently in use in the city of Copenhagen in Denmark. The assessment is accomplished by an independent team composed of philosophers, policy makers, social scientists, technical, legal, and medical experts. By leveraging an interdisciplinary team, we aim to expose the complex trade-offs and the necessity for such thorough human review when tackling socio-technical applications of AI in healthcare. For the assessment, we use a process to assess trustworthy AI, called 1Z-Inspection® to identify specific challenges and potential ethical trade-offs when we consider AI in practice.<br />Frontiers in Human Dynamics, 3<br />ISSN:2673-2726

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
26732726
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........7d58e958408d28f212fc6ccbfbcc794f