Back to Search
Start Over
Development and application of indicators for visual landscape quality to include in life cycle sustainability assessment of Swiss agricultural farms
- Source :
- Ecological Indicators. 110:105788
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2020.
-
Abstract
- Agricultural life cycle analysis (LCA) provides information about the environmental footprint of farming. Life cycle sustainability assessment (LCSA) includes social and economic indicators. As a contribution to LCSA, we developed an indicator measuring the impact of individual farms on visual landscape quality based on state-of-the-art theory for landscape aesthetic assessment and conforming to general LCA principles. The indicator is a composite consisting of two independent sub-indicators, the aggregated diversity indicator (ADI) and the area-weighted preference value (AWPV). Both sub-indicators are based on the preference values of the Swiss population for the most frequent crop types and farmland features. The two sub-indicators were calculated when the land-use types with an available preference value represented 75% of a farms’ utilised agricultural area. Following this rule, we were able to evaluate 91% of Swiss farms. The ADI measures a farm’s contribution to land-use diversity and to seasonal diversity, while the AWPV measures a farm’s contribution to perceived naturalness. The two sub-indicators are combined to form the composite landscape indicator (CLI). The two sub-indicators were computed from Swiss farm structure data for 2015 without additional data collection. Two scenarios were defined to test the independence of the two sub-indicators from each other and the response of the CLI against landscape changes. The first scenario enriched the crop diversity of the farms to test the response of the ADI. The second scenario increased the number of standard trees on farms to test the AWPV. The results showed that the two sub-indicators complement one another by responding to different changes in landscape quality. In both cases, the CLI showed on average increasing values after enriching crop diversity or increasing the number of standard trees on selected farms. The solid conceptual grounding of the two sub-indicators in landscape aesthetic theory combined with LCA principles renders them reproducible and independent of the observer.
- Subjects :
- 0106 biological sciences
education.field_of_study
Data collection
Ecological footprint
Ecology
business.industry
media_common.quotation_subject
Population
General Decision Sciences
010501 environmental sciences
010603 evolutionary biology
01 natural sciences
Agricultural science
Geography
Economic indicator
Crop diversity
Agriculture
Sustainability
Quality (business)
business
education
Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
0105 earth and related environmental sciences
media_common
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 1470160X
- Volume :
- 110
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Ecological Indicators
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi...........7b6e0e34e3c8bc998e047c3a7ff7c204
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105788