Back to Search Start Over

Global Carbon Budget 2019

Authors :
Friedlingstein, Pierre
Jones, Matthew W.
O&Apos;Sullivan, Michael
Andrew, Robbie M.
Hauck, Judith
Peters, Glen P.
Peters, Wouter
Pongratz, Julia
Sitch, Stephen
Le Quéré, Corinne
Bakker, Dorothee C. E.
Canadell, Josep G.
Ciais, Philippe
Jackson, Robert B.
Anthoni, Peter
Barbero, Leticia
Bastos, Ana
Bastrikov, Vladislav
Becker, Meike
Bopp, Laurent
Buitenhuis, Erik
Chandra, Naveen
Chevallier, Frédéric
Chini, Louise P.
Currie, Kim I.
Feely, Richard A.
Gehlen, Marion
Gilfillan, Dennis
Gkritzalis, Thanos
Goll, Daniel S.
Gruber, Nicolas
Gutekunst, Sören
Harris, Ian
Haverd, Vanessa
Houghton, Richard A.
Hurtt, George
Ilyina, Tatiana
Jain, Atul K.
Joetzjer, Emilie
Kaplan, Jed O.
Kato, Etsushi
Klein Goldewijk, Kees
Korsbakken, Jan Ivar
Landschützer, Peter
Lauvset, Siv K.
Lefèvre, Nathalie
Lenton, Andrew
Lienert, Sebastian
Lombardozzi, Danica
Marland, Gregg
McGuire, Patrick C.
Melton, Joe R.
Metzl, Nicolas
Munro, David R.
Nabel, Julia E. M. S.
Nakaoka, Shin-Ichiro
Neill, Craig
Omar, Abdirahman M.
Ono, Tsuneo
Peregon, Anna
Pierrot, Denis
Poulter, Benjamin
Rehder, Gregor
Resplandy, Laure
Robertson, Eddy
Rödenbeck, Christian
Séférian, Roland
Schwinger, Jörg
Smith, Naomi
Tans, Pieter P.
Tian, Hanqin
Tilbrook, Bronte
Tubiello, Francesco N.
Van Der Werf, Guido R.
Wiltshire, Andrew J.
Zaehle, Sönke
Publisher :
Copernicus Publications

Abstract

Accurate assessment of anthropogenic carbon dioxide (CO₂) emissions and their redistributionamong the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere – the “global carbon budget” – is important to betterunderstand the global carbon cycle, support the development of climate policies, and project future climatechange. Here we describe data sets and methodology to quantify the five major components of the global carbon budget and their uncertainties. Fossil CO₂ emissions (EFF) are based on energy statistics and cement productiondata, while emissions from land use change (ELUC), mainly deforestation, are based on land use and land usechange data and bookkeeping models. Atmospheric CO₂ concentration is measured directly and its growth rate (GATM) is computed from the annual changes in concentration. The ocean CO₂ sink (SOCEAN) and terrestrial CO₂ sink (SLAND) are estimated with global process models constrained by observations. The resulting car-bon budget imbalance (BIM), the difference between the estimated total emissions and the estimated changesin the atmosphere, ocean, and terrestrial biosphere, is a measure of imperfect data and understanding of the contemporary carbon cycle. All uncertainties are reported as±1σ. For the last decade available (2009–2018), EFF was 9.5±0.5 GtC yr⁻¹, ELUC 1.5±0.7 GtC yr⁻¹, GATM4.9±0.02 GtC yr⁻¹ (2.3±0.01 ppm yr⁻¹), SOCEAN 2.5±0.6 GtC yr⁻¹, and SLAND 3.2±0.6 GtC yr⁻¹, with a budget imbalance BIM of 0.4 GtC yr⁻¹ indicating overestimated emissions and/or underestimated sinks. For the year 2018 alone, the growth in EFFwas about 2.1 %and fossil emissions increased to 10.0±0.5 GtC yr⁻¹, reaching 10 GtC yr⁻¹ for the first time in history, ELUC was 1.5±0.7 GtC yr⁻¹, for total anthropogenic CO emissions of 11.5±0.9 GtC yr⁻¹ (42.5±3.3 Gt CO₂). Alsofor 2018,GATM was 5.1±0.2 GtC yr⁻¹(2.4±0.1 ppm yr⁻¹), SOCEAN was 2.6±0.6 GtC yr⁻¹, and SLAND was 3.5±0.7 GtC yr⁻¹, with a BIM of 0.3 GtC. The global atmospheric CO2 concentration reached 407.38±0.1 ppmaveraged over 2018. For 2019, preliminary data for the first 6–10 months indicate a reduced growth in EFF of +0.6 % (range of −0.2 % to 1.5 %) based on national emissions projections for China, the USA, the EU, andIndia and projections of gross domestic product corrected for recent changes in the carbon intensity of the economy for the rest of the world. Overall, the mean and trend in the five components of the global carbon budgetare consistently estimated over the period 1959–2018, but discrepancies of up to 1 GtC yr⁻¹ persist for the rep-resentation of semi-decadal variability in CO₂ fluxes. A detailed comparison among individual estimates and theintroduction of a broad range of observations shows (1) no consensus in the mean and trend in land use changeemissions over the last decade, (2) a persistent low agreement between the different methods on the magnitudeof the land CO₂ flux in the northern extra-tropics, and (3) an apparent underestimation of the CO₂ variability byocean models outside the tropics. This living data update documents changes in the methods and data sets usedin this new global carbon budget and the progress in understanding of the global carbon cycle compared withprevious publications of this data set (Le Quéré et al., 2018a, b, 2016, 2015a, b, 2014, 2013).

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........78617ba6517a98dcf1c0a97d03f06e06