Back to Search Start Over

Type versus timing of adverse and benevolent childhood experiences for pregnant women’s psychological and reproductive health

Authors :
Victoria M. Atzl
Angela J. Narayan
Jillian S. Merrick
Alicia F. Lieberman
William W. Harris
Source :
Children and Youth Services Review. 114:105056
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2020.

Abstract

This study examined type and timing of childhood experiences – both adverse (ACEs; Felitti et al., 1998 ) and benevolent (BCEs, a novel index of childhood resources; Narayan, Rivera, Bernstein, Harris, & Lieberman, 2018 ) on several pregnancy-related outcomes. Participants were 101 low-income pregnant women (M = 29.10 years, SD = 6.56, range = 18–44; 37% Latina, 22% African-American, 20% White, 13% biracial/multiracial, 8% other) who completed the ACEs questionnaire for childhood maltreatment versus family dysfunction and the BCEs scale, including the ages when experiences occurred [i.e., 0–5 years (early childhood), 6–12 years (middle childhood), and 13–18 years (adolescence)]. They also reported on psychopathology symptoms, risky reproductive planning, stressful life events (SLEs), and demographics. Analyses supported type, rather than timing of experiences: specific experiences (i.e., maltreatment versus family dysfunction versus BCEs) predicted specific outcomes, regardless of the developmental period when they occurred. Specifically, maltreatment predicted PTSD symptoms, BCEs predicted risky reproductive planning, and family dysfunction and BCEs predicted SLEs. Experiences that began earlier were also more predictive than experiences that began later. Findings suggest that adverse versus benevolent childhood experiences are uniquely linked to adaptation during pregnancy and underscore the importance of also including BCEs in prenatal screening.

Details

ISSN :
01907409
Volume :
114
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Children and Youth Services Review
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........76caa596a54cc62a453db62876e03801
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105056