Comparison of measured vs. predicted performance of jointed plain concrete pavements using the Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guideline

This research evaluates the ability of the Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) to accurately predict the performance of jointed plain concrete pavements (JPCPs). This is accomplished by comparing predicted performances with observed performances for the in-service mainline test cells at Mn/ROAD. These comparisons indicate that MEPDG performance predictions for JPCP are most accurate when the default (constant) built-in equivalent temperature difference of − 5.5°C is used instead of a site-dependent value. It appears that significant portions of the error of estimation can be explained by the sensitivity of the performance models to variability in hardened concrete properties (modulus of rupture, modulus of elasticity and coefficient of thermal expansion) and pavement structural features (slab thickness, joint spacing, subbase type and bond condition). Predictions of slab cracking were found to be highly sensitive to these parameters. In addition, the MEPDG cracking model seemed not to fit ...