Back to Search Start Over

Cervical Spine Injuries with Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury

Authors :
Grit Wüstner
Benedikt Schäfer
Martin Kreutzträger
Axel Ekkernkamp
Marcel A. Kopp
Thomas Liebscher
Johanna Ludwig
Ulrike Grittner
Thomas Auhuber
Tom Lübstorf
Source :
Spine. 47:E16-E26
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2021.

Abstract

Study design Monocenter case-control study. Objective Effects of spinal surgical adverse events (SSAE) on clinical and functional outcome, length of stay, and treatment costs after traumatic cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). Summary of background data Traumatic SCI is a challenge for primary care centers because of the emergency setting and complex injury patterns. SSAE rates of up to 15% are reported for spine fractures without SCI. Little is known about SSAE after traumatic SCI and their outcome relevance. Methods Acute traumatic cervical SCI patients were enrolled from 2011-2017. Cases with and without SSAE were compared regarding neurological recovery, functional outcome, secondary complications, mortality, length of stay and treatment costs. Adjusted logistic regression and generalized estimating equation models were calculated for the endpoints ASIA impairment scale (AIS)-conversion and dysphagia. All analyses were run in the total and in a propensity score matched sample. Results At least one SSAE occurred in 37 of 165 patients (22.4%). Mechanical instability and insufficient spinal decompression were the most frequent SSAE with 13 (7.9%) or 11 (6.7%) cases, respectively. The regression models adjusted for demographic, injury, and surgery characteristics demonstrated a reduced probability for AIS-conversion related to SSAE [OR (95%CI) 0.14 (0.03-0.74)] and additionally to single-sided ventral or dorsal surgical approach [0.12 (0.02-0.69)] in the matched sample. Furthermore, SSAE were associated with higher risk for dysphagia in the matched [4.77 (1.31-17.38)] and the total sample [5.96 (2.07-17.18)]. Primary care costs were higher in cases with SSAE [Median (IQR) 97,300 (78,200-112,300)] EUR compared to cases without SSAE [52,300 (26,700-91,200)] EUR. Conclusions SSAE are an important risk factor after acute traumatic cervical SCI with impact on neurological recovery, functional outcome, and healthcare costs. Reducing SSAE is a viable means to protect the limited intrinsic capacity for recovery from SCI.Level of Evidence: 4.

Details

ISSN :
15281159, 03622436, and 20112017
Volume :
47
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Spine
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........71eb0979e68b51515170111b44ec3109
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000004124