Reduced recurrence of chronic subdural hematomas treated with open surgery followed by middle meningeal artery embolization compared to open surgery alone: a propensity score–matched analysis

OBJECTIVE Middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) is an emerging endovascular treatment technique with proven promising results for chronic subdural hematomas (cSDHs). MMAE as an adjunct to open surgery is being utilized with the goal of preventing the recurrence of cSDH. However, the efficacy of MMAE following surgical evacuation of cSDH has not been clearly demonstrated. The authors sought to compare the outcomes of open surgery followed by MMAE versus open surgery alone. METHODS Patients who underwent surgical evacuation alone (open surgery–alone group) or MMAE along with open surgery for cSDH (adjunctive MMAE group) were identified at the authors’ institution. Two balanced groups were obtained through propensity score matching. Primary outcomes included recurrence risk and reintervention rate. Secondary outcomes included decrease in hematoma size and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at last follow-up. Variables in the two groups were compared by use of the Mann-Whitney U-test, paired-sample t-test, and Fisher’s exact test. RESULTS A total of 345 cases of open surgery alone and 52 cases of open surgery with adjunctive MMAE were identified. After control for subjective confounders, 146 patients treated with open surgery alone and 41 with adjunctive MMAE following open surgery with drain placement were included in the analysis. Before matching, the rebleeding risk and reintervention rate for open surgery trended higher in the open surgery alone than the open surgery plus MMAE group (14.4% vs 7.3%, p = 0.18; and 11.6% vs 4.9%, p = 0.17, respectively). No significant differences were seen in duration of radiographic or clinical follow-ups or decreases in hematoma size and mRS score at last follow-up. After one-to-one nearest neighbor propensity score matching, 26 pairs of cases were compared for outcomes. Rates of recurrence (7.7% vs 30.8%, p = 0.038) and overall reintervention (3.8% vs 23.1%, p = 0.049) after open surgery were found to be significantly lower in the adjunctive MMAE group than the open surgery–alone group. With one-to-many propensity score matching, 76 versus 37 cases were compared for open surgery alone versus adjunctive MMAE following open surgery. Similarly, the adjunctive MMAE group had significantly lower rates of recurrence (5.4% vs 19.7%, p = 0.037) and overall reintervention (2.7% vs 14.5%, p = 0.049). CONCLUSIONS Adjunctive MMAE following open surgery can lower the recurrence risks and reintervention rates for cSDH.