Back to Search
Start Over
Why are hexavalent uranium cyanides rare while U?F and U?O bonds are common and short?
- Source :
- Theoretical Chemistry Accounts: Theory, Computation, and Modeling (Theoretica Chimica Acta). 109:332-340
- Publication Year :
- 2003
- Publisher :
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2003.
-
Abstract
- Relativistic small-core pseudopotential B3LYP and CCSD(T) calculations and frozen-core PW91–PW91 studies are reported for the series UF4X2 (X=H, F, Cl, CN, NC, NCO, OCN, NCS and SCN). The bonding in UF6 is analyzed and found to have some multiple-bond character, approaching at a theoretical limit a bond order of 1.5. In addition to these σ and π orbital interactions, the electrostatic attraction is important. Evidence for π bonding in the other systems studied was also found. The triatomic pseudohalides as well as fluorine and chlorine are in this sense better ligands than cyanide. The –CN group is a σ donor and π acceptor, as uranium itself, and hence is unfit to bond to U(VI). The σ-bonded UH6 is octahedral.
- Subjects :
- 010304 chemical physics
Triatomic molecule
Inorganic chemistry
chemistry.chemical_element
Uranium
010402 general chemistry
01 natural sciences
Bond order
Acceptor
0104 chemical sciences
Pseudopotential
Crystallography
chemistry
Octahedron
0103 physical sciences
Fluorine
CN-group
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 14322234 and 1432881X
- Volume :
- 109
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Theoretical Chemistry Accounts: Theory, Computation, and Modeling (Theoretica Chimica Acta)
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi...........6d716e396fafaa7effe08f1082c3851b
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00214-003-0441-7