Comparison and selection of operation optimization mode of multi-energy and multi-level district heating system: Case study of a district heating system in Xiong’an

The energy industry is undergoing a tremendous transformation from a centralized paradigm to a decentralized one with the employment of various distributed energy technologies and information technologies. Different from the traditional urban central heating system, the district heating system (DHS) with combined energy supply by multi-energy and multi-level energy stations is considered to be promising and can improve the efficiency and flexibility of the energy system. However, its complex system structure and multiple stakeholders bring new challenges to the operation optimization. Therefore, in the face of the DHS, two optimization models are applied in this study: 1) Independent Optimization Model (IOM): the operation strategies of each energy station are optimized independently, and each station then submits its own energy demand to the upper-level energy station; 2) Collaboration Optimization Model (COM): a model established for all energy stations for global optimization. A small number of existing papers on the operation optimization of such DHS have ignored the contradiction between social benefits and operators’ profits, and do not study the gap between the two models. Therefore, this paper takes COM as the benchmark, quantitatively evaluating the potential of IOM for improving the overall energy efficiency under the interest game, and grasps the key reasons that restrict its energy saving potential, aiming to improve its comprehensive benefits. An actual DHS in China was used as a case study to explore the above problems. The results show that, although COM is more energy-saving, it loses 18.3% of the profits of energy integrators, and increases the profits of energy suppliers by 13.8%. Compared with COM, the primary energy consumption of IOM increases by 19.1%. For the results, this paper finally discusses whether it is possible to further improve the energy efficiency of IOM by adjusting the heat price without impairing the profits of the operators. The results indicate that the system’s primary energy consumption reduces by 5.2% without impairing the profits of each operator.