Back to Search Start Over

Predicting Mortality and Functional Outcomes after Ischemic Stroke: External Validation of a Prognostic Model

Authors :
Jason Mackey
Matthew L. Flaherty
Sharyl Martini
Opeolu Adeoye
Felipe De Los Rios La Rosa
Kathleen Alwell
Brett M. Kissela
Christopher J. Lindsell
Charles J Moomaw
Dawn Kleindorfer
Achala Vagal
Heidi Sucharewv
Pooja Khatri
Daniel Woo
Simona Ferioli
Source :
Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science. :587-597
Publication Year :
2018
Publisher :
Scientific Research Publishing, Inc., 2018.

Abstract

Background: We previously developed predictive models for 3-month mortality and modified Rankin Score (mRS) after ischemic stroke. Aim: The aim was to test model validity for 3-month mortality and mRS after ischemic stroke in two independent data sets. Methods: Our derivation models used data from 451 subjects with ischemic stroke in 1999 enrolled in the Greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky Stroke Study (GCKNSS). We utilized two separate cohorts of ischemic strokes through GCKNSS (460 in 2005 and 504 in 2010) to assess external validity by utilizing measures of agreement between predicted and observed values, calibration, and discrimination using Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis. Results: The 3-month mortality model performed well in the validation datasets with an average prediction error (Brier score) of 0.045 for 2005 and 0.053 for 2010 and excellent discrimination with an area under the curve of 0.86 (95% CI: 0.79, 0.93) for 2005 and 0.84 (0.76, 0.92) for 2010. Predicted 3-month mRS also performed well in the validation datasets with R2 of 0.57 for 2005 and 0.50 for 2010 and a root mean square error of 0.85 for 2005 and 1.05 for 2010. Predicted mRS tended to be higher than actual in both validation datasets. Re-estimation of the model parameters for age and severe white matter hyperintensity in both 2005 and 2010, and for diabetes in 2005, improved predictive accuracy. Conclusions: Our previously developed stroke models performed well in two study periods, suggesting validity of the model predictions.

Details

ISSN :
21605874 and 21605866
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........68825de1813a28e799cc0c3afac53b5e