Back to Search Start Over

Adjuvant Lapatinib and Trastuzumab for Early Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Positive Breast Cancer: Results From the Randomized Phase III Adjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimization Trial

Authors :
Chiun-Sheng Huang
Christian Jackisch
Michael Untch
A Armour
David W. Hillman
Jo Anne Zujewski
Eleanor McFadden
Stella Dolci
Véronique Diéras
Jośe Baselga
Amylou C. Dueck
Sergei Tjulandin
Edith A. Perez
Antonio C. Wolff
Holger Eidtmann
Frances M. Boyle
Young-Hyuck Im
Kathleen I. Pritchard
Ian E. Smith
Thomas M. Suter
Andrew P. Holmes
Evandro de Azambuja
Giuseppe Viale
Serena Di Cosimo
Liu Tong-hua
Eileen Holmes
Binghe Xu
Aron Goldhirsch
Richard D. Gelber
Henry L. Gomez
Ann E. McCullough
Martine Piccart-Gebhart
István Láng
Nadia Harbeck
Phuong Dinh
Source :
Journal of Clinical Oncology. 34:1034-1042
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2016.

Abstract

Background Lapatinib (L) plus trastuzumab (T) improves outcomes for metastatic human epidermal growth factor 2–positive breast cancer and increases the pathologic complete response in the neoadjuvant setting, but their role as adjuvant therapy remains uncertain. Methods In the Adjuvant Lapatinib and/or Trastuzumab Treatment Optimization trial, patients with centrally confirmed human epidermal growth factor 2–positive early breast cancer were randomly assigned to 1 year of adjuvant therapy with T, L, their sequence (T→L), or their combination (L+T). The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS), with 850 events required for 80% power to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.8 for L+T versus T. Results Between June 2007 and July 2011, 8,381 patients were enrolled. In 2011, due to futility to demonstrate noninferiority of L versus T, the L arm was closed, and patients free of disease were offered adjuvant T. A protocol modification required P ≤ .025 for the two remaining pairwise comparisons. At a protocol-specified analysis with a median follow-up of 4.5 years, a 16% reduction in the DFS hazard rate was observed with L+T compared with T (555 DFS events; HR, 0.84; 97.5% CI, 0.70 to 1.02; P = .048), and a 4% reduction was observed with T→L compared with T (HR, 0.96; 97.5% CI, 0.80 to 1.15; P = .61). L-treated patients experienced more diarrhea, cutaneous rash, and hepatic toxicity compared with T-treated patients. The incidence of cardiac toxicity was low in all treatment arms. Conclusion Adjuvant treatment that includes L did not significantly improve DFS compared with T alone and added toxicity. One year of adjuvant T remains standard of care.

Details

ISSN :
15277755 and 0732183X
Volume :
34
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........687c23122a6e9578000bb6a95b0c03d7
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2015.62.1797