Back to Search Start Over

Implementation of TG-51: practical considerations

Authors :
D.S. Folowill
W.F. Hanson
Jessica Lowenstein
Peter A Balter
Source :
Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (Cat. No.00CH37143).
Publication Year :
2002
Publisher :
IEEE, 2002.

Abstract

The AAPM Task Group 51 (TG-51) recently published its protocol for clinical reference dosimetry of megavoltage radiation therapy. Explicit application of TG-51 to a high energy accelerator with electron capability requires the clinical physicist to have a 1 mm thick sheet of lead and a parallel plate chamber. Many clinical physicists have neither, therefore the authors have studied the impact of alternative measurement techniques on output calibration to solve this problem. Depth dose measurements with a lead sheet in the beam are required to determine the beam quality (kQ) by obtaining the %dd(10)/sub x/ (depth dose with electron contamination removed) for energies /spl ges/10 MV, TG-51 also states that a parallel plate chamber is recommended for electron calibration and is required for reference dosimetry for electron energies /spl les/6 MeV. To determine if these requirements are necessary, the Radiological Physics Center (RPC) made measurements on Varlan, GE, and Siemens units for 10 and 18 MV photons and 5-20 MeV electrons. The comparison of lead versus no lead revealed that the k/sub Q/ value, thus the calibration of the beam, will vary by no more than 0.2%. The comparison between a parallel plate and a cylindrical Farmer chamber showed no measurable difference in the calibration across the range of electron energies. Omission of the lead to determine k/sub Q/ and use of a cylindrical chamber for low electron energies have an insignificant effect on the calibration.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Proceedings of the 22nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (Cat. No.00CH37143)
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........66eeca5f98a1383bd8285217abf19f79
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1109/iembs.2000.901349