Back to Search Start Over

Prostate-specific antigen test in diagnostic evaluation of chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome

Authors :
Anthony J. Schaeffer
Stephen D. Mikolajczyk
Kathleen J. Propert
Robert B. Nadler
Jill S. Knauss
Richard B. Alexander
Jackson E. Fowler
J. Richard Landis
Mary McNaughton Collins
Source :
Urology. 67:337-342
Publication Year :
2006
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2006.

Abstract

Objectives To determine whether prostate-specific antigen (PSA), the percent free PSA, or free PSA isoforms may be used as diagnostic markers for chronic prostatitis/chronic pelvic pain syndrome (CP/CPPS; National Institutes of Health category IIIa and IIIb). Methods We evaluated 421 patients enrolled in the Chronic Prostatitis Cohort Study and 112 age-matched controls. Subjects were stratified by the number of white blood cells (WBCs) in their expressed prostatic secretions and pain as determined by the National Institutes of Health Chronic Prostatitis Symptom Index. Results Total PSA, free PSA, and [−2]proPSA ([−2]pPSA) were significantly elevated in those with CP/CPPS compared with controls (mean PSA 1.97 ng/mL versus 1.72 ng/mL, P = 0.03; mean free PSA 0.76 ng/mL versus 0.70 ng/mL, P = 0.01; and [−2]pPSA 2.38 ng/mL versus 1.80 ng/mL, P = 0.04). The percent free PSA was not significantly different between the patients and controls. For those with CP/CPPS, the percent free PSA was significantly lower as the WBC count rose in the expressed prostatic secretions (0 WBCs = 43.29 versus more than 25 WBCs = 26.52; P Conclusions Men with elevated PSA values and CP/CPPS should be treated as one would any other patient screened for prostate cancer with an elevated PSA level. Although PSA, free PSA, and [−2]pPSA were slightly elevated in men with CP/CPPS, the low sensitivity and specificity do not warrant using them as biomarkers for CP/CPPS.

Details

ISSN :
00904295
Volume :
67
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Urology
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........64b8ea71cfbea9d638637c73d10e657c
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2005.08.031