Back to Search
Start Over
EU GDPR or APEC CBPR? A comparative analysis of the approach of the EU and APEC to cross border data transfers and protection of personal data in the IoT era
- Source :
- Computer Law & Security Review. 35:380-397
- Publication Year :
- 2019
- Publisher :
- Elsevier BV, 2019.
-
Abstract
- This article examines the two major international data transfer schemes in existence today – the European Union (EU) model which at present is effectively the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), and the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC) Cross Border Privacy Rules system (CBPR), in the context of the Internet of Things (IoT). While IoT data ostensibly relates to things i.e. products and services, it impacts individuals and their data protection and privacy rights, and raises compliance issues for corporations especially in relation to international data flows. The GDPR regulates the processing of personal data of individuals who are EU data subjects including cross border data transfers. As an EU Regulation, the GDPR applies directly as law to EU member nations. The GDPR also has extensive extraterritorial provisions that apply to processing of personal data outside the EU regardless of place of incorporation and geographical area of operation of the data controller/ processor. There are a number of ways that the GDPR enables lawful international transfer of personal data including schemes that are broadly similar to APEC CBPR. APEC CBPR is the other major regional framework regulating transfer of personal data between APEC member nations. It is essentially a voluntary accountability scheme that initially requires acceptance at country level, followed by independent certification by an accountability agent of the organization wishing to join the scheme. APEC CBPR is viewed by many in the United States of America (US) as preferable to the EU approach because CBPR is considered more conducive to business than its counterpart schemes under the GDPR, and therefore is regarded as the scheme most likely to prevail. While there are broad areas of similarity between the EU and APEC approaches to data protection in the context of cross border data transfer, there are also substantial differences. This paper considers the similarities and major differences, and the overall suitability of the two models for the era of the Internet of Things (IoT) in which large amounts of personal data are processed on an on-going basis from connected devices around the world. This is the first time the APEC and GDPR cross-border data schemes have been compared in this way. The paper concludes with the author expressing a view as to which scheme is likely to set the global standard.
- Subjects :
- Relation (database)
Computer Networks and Communications
business.industry
020207 software engineering
Context (language use)
02 engineering and technology
Certification
International trade
General Business, Management and Accounting
020204 information systems
General Data Protection Regulation
Accountability
0202 electrical engineering, electronic engineering, information engineering
media_common.cataloged_instance
Data Protection Act 1998
Business
European union
Law
Register of data controllers
media_common
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 02673649
- Volume :
- 35
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Computer Law & Security Review
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi...........63de8fdb15ea23a0be7da97bc3ce4515