Back to Search Start Over

Sustainable grazing systems for the Central Tablelands of New South Wales. 4. Soil water dynamics and runoff events for differently-managed pasture types

Authors :
I.J. Packer
T.B. Koen
Justin Hughes
S.M. Priest
G. D. Millar
P. M. Dowling
David Kemp
David Michalk
W. McG. King
Stuart Brisbane
Source :
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture. 46:483
Publication Year :
2006
Publisher :
CSIRO Publishing, 2006.

Abstract

Soil water, runoff amount and quality, pasture production and environmental data were measured for a pastoral prime lamb enterprise in the Central Tablelands of New South Wales from 1998 to 2002. There were 4 pasture treatments: fertilised and sown chicory (CH), fertilised and sown introduced pastures (SP), fertilised naturalised pastures (FN) and unfertilised naturalised pastures (UN). Two grazing management regimes, tactically grazed (TG) and continuously grazed (CG) were imposed on the SP, FN and UN treatments. The CH treatment was rotationally grazed. To compare pasture and grazing system water use, maximum soil water deficit values (SWDMax) were calculated from neutron moisture meter data. SWDMax was influenced by both environmental and management factors. Management factors that influenced SWDMax were herbage mass of perennials, degree of perenniality, and the perennial species present. Environmental factors accounted for >50% of the variation in SWDMax. Inclusion of management factors (perennial herbage mass of C3 and C4 species and percentage perennial herbage mass), accounted for an additional 16% of variation. While the influence of pasture management appears to be relatively small, importantly, management is the only avenue available to land managers for influencing SWDMax. The UNTG and all sown treatments, with greater perennial herbage mass or greater C4 herbage mass consistently produced the highest SWDMax. Runoff amount and quality data are presented for ground cover percentages which generally exceeded 80% for the experimental period. Runoff as a proportion of rain received during the experiment was

Details

ISSN :
08161089
Volume :
46
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Australian Journal of Experimental Agriculture
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........638f08ad20ced8d4ba0561a18cccebfa
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1071/ea04269