Back to Search Start Over

Checkpoint inhibitors assessment in oropharynx cancer (CIAO): Safety and interim results

Authors :
Ryan P. Goepfert
Andrew G. Sikora
Jack Phan
J. Jack Lee
Diana Bell
Maura L. Gillison
M. Laura Rubin
Faye M. Johnson
Renata Ferrarotto
Yasir Elamin
Bonnie S. Glisson
Jeffrey N. Myers
Neil D. Gross
Amy C. Hessel
Jason M. Johnson
Source :
Journal of Clinical Oncology. 37:6008-6008
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2019.

Abstract

6008 Background: Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 are active in metastatic oropharynx squamous cell carcinoma (OPC). Durvalumab (durva) and tremelimumab (tremi) target respectively PD-L1 and CTLA-4, which in combination may be synergistic. Here we report the safety and interim results of durva vs. durva+tremi prior to surgery in a window of opportunity trial in OPC. Methods: Pts were randomized 1:1 to durva 1500 mg or durva 1500 mg + tremi 75 mg IV Q4W x 2 cycles. The primary objective was to quantify pre- and post-treatment differences in CD8+ tumor infiltrating lymphocytes for the two arms. Secondary objectives included safety, toxicity, ORR by RECIST, fraction of patients undergoing surgery at 8 wks, and percentage viable tumor cells in the surgical specimen. Serial pre- and post-treatment blood and tumor specimens were collected for ongoing correlative analyses. Results: 28 pts enrolled: median age 64y, 27 (96%) male, 19 (68%) newly diagnosed, most (63%) at stage IVA (AJCC 7th Ed), 9 (32%) had locoregional recurrence, 24 (86%) p16 positive, and 22 (79%) had ≤ 10 PPY smoking history. Median follow-up was 7.6 months. The most common AEs were fatigue (36%), leukopenia/lymphopenia (25%), transaminitis (25%), and rash (21%). Grade 3 AEs occurred in 4 (14%) pts: 2 elevated lipase, 1 diarrhea, and 1 hepatitis, all were manageable. There were no grade >3 AEs. ORR was 43%: 50% had SD (including 29% tumor shrinkage in 1 pt). Treatment effect in the surgical specimen was observed in 19 (79%) of 24 evaluable pts; 2 pts had major pathologic response (≤ 10% viable tumor) at the primary site. Efficacy was equivalent in both arms. The 2 pts with PD and 1 pt with SD were switched to chemotherapy after durva +/- tremi before resection; interestingly, each achieved a pCR in the primary. Most pts (57%) didn’t receive radiotherapy after surgery. There was a statistically significant association between ORR and treatment effect (p=0.014). The median percentage of viable tumor in the primary was 37.5% in pts with PR, and 82.5% in SD (p=0.003). Conclusions: Durva +/- tremi prior to surgery was well tolerated in OPC pts. Activity is encouraging with treatment effect seen in 79% of pts. The primary endpoint and complete efficacy data will be presented. Clinical trial information: NCT03144778.

Details

ISSN :
15277755 and 0732183X
Volume :
37
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........5f494f72e28d8cc640b7cc7da1909833