Back to Search Start Over

418 Clinical translation of methylated DNA markers of endometrial cancer using tampon-based detection

Authors :
Calise K. Berger
Maureen A. Lemens
Shannon K. Laughlin-Tommaso
John K. Schoolmeester
Matthew R. Hopkins
Megan A. Clarke
Xiaoming Cao
Kelli N. Burger
Mark E. Sherman
Julie Staub
Vijayalakshmi Shridhar
Jamie N. Bakkum-Gamez
Nicolas Wentzensen
Seth W. Slettedahl
William R. Taylor
David A. Ahlquist
Douglas W. Mahoney
J Kisel
A.L. VanOosten
S Kerr
Maria McGlinch
Karen A. Doering
Patrick H. Foote
Source :
Poster.
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
BMJ Publishing Group Ltd, 2020.

Abstract

Objective In tampon samples from women with and without EC, we tested methylated DNA markers (MDMs) for EC originally identified through discovery and validation in tissue. Methods From 2/2013–8/2019, women ≥45 yrs with abnormal or postmenopausal bleeding or biopsy-proven EC were prospectively enrolled for vaginal fluid collection via tampon before endometrial sampling or hysterectomy, respectively. ECs were frequency matched by menopausal status and tampon collection date to benign endometrium (BE) controls. Tampons were placed in preservative buffer; extracted DNA from cell pellet was bisulfite-converted and underwent methylated specific PCR for 29 top performing EC and other solid tumor MDMs (MAX.chr12.52652301, CDH4, EMX2OS, c17orf64, NBPF8, SFMBT2, JSRP1, DIDO1, MAX.chr10.22624479, MPZ, ZNF506, VILL, GATA2, MAX.chr14.103021656, CYTH2, LRRC8D, LYPLAL1, MAX.chr8.145103829, SQSTM1, ZNF323, OBSCN, MAX.chr9.36739811, ZNF90, LRRC41.8188, LRRC34, GDF7, MDFI, EEF1A2, SEPT9). Random forest modeling analysis performed to generate predictive probability of underlying EC. Results 100 EC and 92 BE were enrolled. The 29-MDM panel highly discriminated between EC and BE (96% (95%CI 89–99%) specificity; 76% (66–84%) sensitivity (AUC 0.88). In 2/2017, the PBS-based tampon buffer was modified to include 50 mmol EDTA. The 29-MDM panel demonstrated greater sensitivity in tampon samples (57 EC; 52 BE) collected into PBS/EDTA buffer (96% (95% CI 87–99%) specificity; 81% (68–90%) sensitivity (AUC 0.90). Among endometrioid and serous histologies, the panel correctly identified 85% and 78%, respectively, and the majority of other subtypes (table 1). Conclusion Top EC plus other solid tumor MDMs performed with promisingly high sensitivity and specificity in tampon-collected vaginal fluid. PBS/EDTA buffer improves sensitivity.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Poster
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........5a4de2f72c49c1c38df9971f2c021704