Back to Search Start Over

Serum tau and neurological outcome in cardiac arrest

Authors :
Gisela Lilja
Christian Rylander
Tobias Cronberg
Pascal Stammet
Anders Aneman
Philip S. Insel
Jesper Kjaergaard
Niklas Nielsen
Niklas Mattsson
Henrik Zetterberg
Hans Friberg
Kaj Blennow
Tommaso Pellis
Matt P. Wise
Michael A. Kuiper
Jørn Wetterslev
Christian Hassager
Josef Dankiewicz
Source :
Annals of Neurology. 82:665-675
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
Wiley, 2017.

Abstract

Objective: To test serum tau as a predictor of neurological outcome after cardiac arrest. Methods: We measured the neuronal protein tau in serum at 24, 48, and 72 hours after cardiac arrest in 689 patients in the prospective international Target Temperature Management trial. The main outcome was poor neurological outcome, defined as Cerebral Performance Categories 3–5 at 6 months. Results: Increased tau was associated with poor outcome at 6 months after cardiac arrest (median = 38.5, interquartile range [IQR] = 5.7–245ng/l in poor vs median = 1.5, IQR = 0.7–2.4ng/l in good outcome, for tau at 72 hours, p < 0.0001). Tau improved prediction of poor outcome compared to using clinical information (p < 0.0001). Tau cutoffs had low false-positive rates (FPRs) for good outcome while retaining high sensitivity for poor outcome. For example, tau at 72 hours had FPR = 2% (95% CI = 1–4%) with sensitivity = 66% (95% CI = 61–70%). Tau had higher accuracy than serum neuron-specific enolase (NSE; the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.91 for tau vs 0.86 for NSE at 72 hours, p = 0.00024). During follow-up (up to 956 days), tau was significantly associated with overall survival. The accuracy in predicting outcome by serum tau was equally high for patients randomized to 33 °C and 36 °C targeted temperature after cardiac arrest. Interpretation: Serum tau is a promising novel biomarker for prediction of neurological outcome in patients with cardiac arrest. It may be significantly better than serum NSE, which is recommended in guidelines and currently used in clinical practice in several countries to predict outcome after cardiac arrest. Ann Neurol 2017;82:665–675. (Less)

Details

ISSN :
03645134
Volume :
82
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Annals of Neurology
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........5a183aa829cd1164f3411830bea41d4a
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/ana.25067