Back to Search Start Over

Predictors of characteristics associated with negative first SARS-CoV-2 PCR testing despite final diagnosis of COVID-19, and association with treatment and outcomes. The COVID-19 RT-PCR Study

Authors :
Aurélie Le Thuaut
Mickaël Ohana
Gwenhael Colin
Claire Hussenet
Nicolas Serck
Guillaume Geri
Gaetane Ribeyre
Thomas Gille
Jean Baptiste Mesland
Anne Sophie Boureau
Bertrand Sauneuf
Jean-Baptiste Lascarrou
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 2020.

Abstract

BackgroundReverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing is an important tool for the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, performance concerns have recently emerged, especially about its sensitivity.. We hypothesized that clinical, biological and radiological characteristics of patients with false negative first RT-PCR testing, despite final diagnosis of COVID-19, might differ from patients with positive first RT-PCR.MethodsCase – control, multicenter study in which COVID-19 patients with negative first RT-PCR testing were matched to patients with positive first RT-PCR on age, gender and initial admission unit (ward or intensive care).ResultsBetween March 30, and June 22, 2020, 80 cases and 80 controls were included. Neither proportion of death at hospital discharge, nor duration of hospital length stay differed between “case” and “control” patients (P = 0.80 and P = 0.54, respectively). In multivariate analysis, headache (adjusted OR: 0.07 [0.01; 0.49]; P = 0.007) and fatigue/malaise (aOR: 0.16 [0.03; 0.81]; P = 0.027) were associated with lower risk of false negative, whereas platelets > 207.103.mm−3 (aOR: 3.81 [1.10; 13.16]; P = 0.034) and CRP > 79.8 mg.L−1 (aOR: 4.00 [1.21; 13.19]; P = 0.023) were associated with higher risk of false negative.InterpretationPatients with suspected COVID-19 and higher inflammatory biological signs expected higher risk of false negative RT-PCR testing. Strategy of serial RT-PCR testings must be rigorously evaluated before adoption by clinicians.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........59f2ed9eacca11d8125a13e2e20c3be8
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.14.20194001