Phase I study of 131I-MIBG with dinutuximab for patients with relapsed or refractory neuroblastoma: A report from the new approaches to neuroblastoma therapy (NANT) consortium

10038 Background: 131I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) is one of the most active salvage therapies for patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) high-risk neuroblastoma (HRNB). Preclinical neuroblastoma studies show cooperative effects when radiation is combined with anti-GD2 monoclonal antibody (mAb). We hypothesized that MIBG would synergize with the anti-GD2 mAb dinutuximab to provide improved anti-tumor responses. The primary aims of Part A of this study were to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and/or recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) of MIBG administered with dinutuximab in children with R/R HRNB and to define and describe the toxicities. Methods: Patients 1-29 years of age with R/R HRNB who had MIBG uptake in ≥ 1 site were eligible. Prior anti-GD2 mAb therapy was allowed provided it was not administered with MIBG and not permanently discontinued due to toxicity. One prior MIBG therapy was allowed. MIBG was administered on day 1 at one of three dose levels (DLs): 12, 15, and 18 mCi/kg (DL1-DL3, respectively) with an expansion cohort at the RP2D. Doses were escalated using a rolling six design starting at DL1. The primary endpoint was dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) during course 1. Dinutuximab (17.5 mg/m2/dose) was administered intravenously on days 8-11 and 29-32 and GM-CSF (250 mcg/m2/dose) subcutaneously on days 8-17 and 29-38. Autologous peripheral blood stem cells were infused to all patients on day 15 (+/- 2 days). A maximum of 2 courses per patient were allowed. Response rate was defined as the proportion of patients with a complete or partial response. Results: Thirty-one patients were enrolled. Fourteen were evaluable for dose escalation (4 on DL1, 4 on DL2, and 6 on DL3); 5 evaluable patients were treated in the DL3 expansion. The median age was 7.4 years (range: 3.1 – 22.0) and 20 (65%) were male. Twenty-seven (87%) patients had previously received a median of 8.5 cycles of chemoimmunotherapy (range: 2 – 21). Eight patients previously progressed while receiving anti-GD2 mAb including 7 in DL3. Five (16%) patients had previously received MIBG. No patient at any dose level experienced DLT. Common grade 3/4 treatment-related toxicities were expected hematologic toxicities attributable to MIBG and non-hematologic toxicities attributable to dinutuximab or GM-CSF. Among 26 response-evaluable patients, the centrally-confirmed response rate was 31% across all dose levels: 2/6 (33%) in DL1, 3/5 (60%) in DL2, and 3/15 (20%) in DL3. There were 3 minor responses, 1 in DL2 and 2 in DL3. Conclusions: The RP2D of MIBG in combination with standard doses of dinutuximab and GM-CSF is 18 mCi/kg. This radioimmunotherapy regimen is well-tolerated without additive toxicity. Preliminary efficacy data are encouraging in this heavily pre-treated patient population. A phase 2 trial of this regimen is planned in patients with R/R HRNB. Clinical trial information: NCT03332667.