IF14. A Divided Case Mix Produces Inferior Results for Patients, Whereas a Focused Vascular Practice Leads to Improved Outcomes

MLA

Ginger Jin, et al. “IF14. A Divided Case Mix Produces Inferior Results for Patients, Whereas a Focused Vascular Practice Leads to Improved Outcomes.” Journal of Vascular Surgery, vol. 67, June 2018, pp. e63–64. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2018.03.042.

APA

Ginger Jin, Laura T. Boitano, James C. Iannuzzi, W. Darrin Clouse, Adam Tanious, David C. Chang, Mark F. Conrad, & Linda J. Wang. (2018). IF14. A Divided Case Mix Produces Inferior Results for Patients, Whereas a Focused Vascular Practice Leads to Improved Outcomes. Journal of Vascular Surgery, 67, e63–e64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2018.03.042

Chicago

Ginger Jin, Laura T. Boitano, James C. Iannuzzi, W. Darrin Clouse, Adam Tanious, David C. Chang, Mark F. Conrad, and Linda J. Wang. 2018. “IF14. A Divided Case Mix Produces Inferior Results for Patients, Whereas a Focused Vascular Practice Leads to Improved Outcomes.” Journal of Vascular Surgery 67 (June): e63–64. doi:10.1016/j.jvs.2018.03.042.