An Automated Approach to Mapping Ocean Front Features Using Sentinel-1 with Examples from the Gulf Stream and Agulhas Current

This study examines the efficacy of Sentinel-1 Radial Velocity (RVL) imagery at determining the position of ocean current front features, using the Gulf Stream (GS) and Agulhas Current (AC) as case studies. Fronts derived from RVL imagery are compared to fronts derived from Sea Surface Temperature (SST) imagery, specifically Multi-scale Ultra-high Resolution Sea Surface Temperature Analysis (MURSST) data. In the case of the GS, front locations from the Naval Oceanographic Office (NAVOCEANO) were also used for comparison. Only the northern walls of ocean current features are considered in this study, which is broken into three main steps: Preprocessing, front extraction, and front comparison. First, RVL imagery is selected from Sentinel-1 ocean products, preprocessed to remove antenna mispointing artifacts, and all products from the same orbit are combined into a single swath. Second, front features are extracted from both the RVL and MURSST imagery using a ridge detection algorithm, the main ocean current is chosen from all ridge features using a ranking algorithm, and the northern wall of this current is extracted. Third, the RVL, SST, and in the case of the GS, NAVOCEANO GS locations, features are compared using a symmetric Hausdorff Distance (HD) measure, and Mean Hausdorff Distance (MHD). In some cases, the automatic front extraction failed by either misclassifying an eddy or similar ocean feature as the ocean current in either the RVL or SST image or failed to extract the entire length of the front visible within the image. All the SST and RVL fronts were classified manually to determine the success rate of the automatic front extraction and to exclude failed front extractions from the analysis, as they are not accurate representations of the SST and RVL data’s ability to detect fronts. In special cases, the RVL image itself does not detect the entire ocean current, such that there are noticeable gaps in the ocean current. Similarly, in special cases the MURSST does not detect the entire ocean current. The automatic front extraction succeeded 65% of the time, including the special cases. The results demonstrated that RVL products were effective at determining the location of ocean fronts where the angle of the front's normal vector is within approximately 40° of the sensor’s azimuthal heading. A mean HD of 31.9 km and a mean MHD of 13.2 km was calculated for all front pairs over all study areas. The RVL fronts appeared consistently to the north of the SST fronts, with an average offset of 25.4 km between the centroids of the SST and RVL fronts. Positive correlations were noted between cloud coverage and MURSST error in both study regions. Several RVL images detected ocean currents in regions of high MURSST error where the MURSST did not detect the ocean currents, suggesting that RVL may provide more accuracy than SST-based products in clouded regions where there is no auxiliary data.