Back to Search Start Over

Factors impacting enrollment on NCI-COG Pediatric MATCH trial treatment protocols

Authors :
Sinchita Roy-Chowdhuri
Lauren Saguilig
Paul M. Williams
Todd A. Alonzo
Donald W. Parsons
Naoko Takebe
Nilsa C. Ramirez
Brent Coffey
Margaret M. Mooney
David R. Patton
Jin Piao
James V. Tricoli
Stacey L. Berg
Jennifer Lee
Douglas S. Hawkins
Mark J. Routbort
Nita L. Seibel
Katherine A. Janeway
Elizabeth Fox
Gregory J. Tsongalis
Source :
Journal of Clinical Oncology. 39:10007-10007
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2021.

Abstract

10007 Background: The NCI-Children’s Oncology Group (COG) Pediatric Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (MATCH) trial assigns patients age 1 to 21 years with relapsed or refractory solid tumors, lymphomas, and histiocytic disorders to phase 2 treatment arms of molecularly-targeted therapies based on the genetic alterations detected in their tumor. Treatment arm assignments and enrollment decisions have now been made for 1000 study participants: we report here match and enrollment data and factors affecting treatment protocol enrollment. Methods: Patients enrolled in the Pediatric MATCH screening protocol were assigned to an open treatment protocol if an actionable mutation (aMOI) was detected by tumor DNA and RNA-based cancer gene panel sequencing. After a match, treatment protocol enrollment must occur within 8-12 weeks. Patient demographic data, reasons for not enrolling on treatment protocol (if applicable), and prior history of molecular testing were reported by study sites. The Fisher exact test was used to compare protocol enrollment rates between groups. Results: Results were analyzed for the first 1000 patients with testing completed (enrolled between July 2017 and October 2020). At least one tumor aMOI was detected in 310 (31%) patients and treatment protocol slots were available for 284 patients (28%). A total of 131 patients (46% of those matched) enrolled on a treatment arm. No difference in treatment protocol match or enrollment rate was observed for gender, race, or ethnicity. Both treatment protocol match rate (105/275, 38% vs 86/394, 22%) and enrollment rate (56/275, 20% vs 33/394, 8%) were significantly more frequent in patients with a reported history of prior molecular testing (p

Details

ISSN :
15277755 and 0732183X
Volume :
39
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........4f240928b3a5a4440f462d689e0b42fa
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.10007