Back to Search
Start Over
The Hoover Commission's Personnel Recommendations—a Progress Report
- Source :
- American Political Science Review. 47:100-125
- Publication Year :
- 1953
- Publisher :
- Cambridge University Press (CUP), 1953.
-
Abstract
- The Hoover Commission's personnel management report was published on February 9, 1949, early in the first session of the 81st Congress. Four sessions of the Congress have had an opportunity to act on the report, and the executive branch has had four years to take advantage of those recommendations that could be adopted by administrative action. This seems to be an appropriate time, therefore, to review the record of progress in both legislative and executive branches, in order to learn the extent to which these far-reaching recommendations for improvement of federal personnel management have been adopted.Soon after publication of the report, intensive study and discussions began within the executive branch. The Civil Service Commission sent a preliminary memorandum of its views to the President on March 23, 1949, with a transmittal letter referring to the report as a “constructive document,” and agreeing with the objective of establishing a civilian career service. The Federal Personnel Council, composed of personnel directors of federal agencies and representatives of the Civil Service Commission and the Bureau of the Budget, made a detailed study of the report and submitted a number of comments to the Civil Service Commission.
- Subjects :
- Sociology and Political Science
media_common.quotation_subject
Memorandum
Legislature
Commission
Public administration
Executive branch
Letter of transmittal
Session (web analytics)
Management
Political science
Service (economics)
Human resource management
Political Science and International Relations
media_common
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15375943 and 00030554
- Volume :
- 47
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- American Political Science Review
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi...........476aaa064b7aa008ac49f65b93794a35
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1950960