Back to Search Start Over

Effect of a Patient Decision Aid on Lung Cancer Screening Decision-Making by Persons Who Smoke

Authors :
Lisa M. Lowenstein
Vance Rabius
Reginald F. Munden
Angelina Esparza
Myrna C.B. Godoy
Scott B. Cantor
Therese B. Bevers
Robert J. Volk
Kamisha Hamilton Escoto
Viola B. Leal
Pamela Luckett
Ashley J. Housten
Linda Bailey
Heather Lin
Paul M. Cinciripini
Source :
JAMA Network Open. 3:e1920362
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
American Medical Association (AMA), 2020.

Abstract

Importance Lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography lowers lung cancer mortality but has potential harms. Current guidelines support patients receiving information about the benefits and harms of lung cancer screening during decision-making. Objective To examine the effect of a patient decision aid (PDA) about lung cancer screening compared with a standard educational material (EDU) on decision-making outcomes among smokers. Design, Setting, and Participants This randomized clinical trial was conducted using 13 state tobacco quitlines. Current and recent tobacco quitline clients who met age and smoking history eligibility for lung cancer screening were enrolled from March 30, 2015, to September 12, 2016, and followed up for 6 months until May 5, 2017. Data analysis was conducted between May 5, 2017, and September 30, 2018. Interventions Participants were randomized to the PDA videoLung Cancer Screening: Is It Right for Me?(n = 259) or to EDU (n = 257). Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcomes were preparation for decision-making and decisional conflict measured at 1 week. Secondary outcomes included knowledge, intentions, and completion of screening within 6 months of receiving the intervention measured by patient report. Results Of 516 quit line clients enrolled, 370 (71.7%) were younger than 65 years, 320 (62.0%) were female, 138 (26.7%) identified as black, 47 (9.1%) did not have health insurance, and 226 (43.8%) had a high school or lower educational level. Of participants using the PDA, 153 of 227 (67.4%) were well prepared to make a screening decision compared with 108 of 224 participants (48.2%) using EDU (odds ratio [OR], 2.31; 95% CI, 1.56-3.44;P Conclusions and Relevance In this study, a PDA delivered to clients of tobacco quit lines improved informed decision-making about lung cancer screening. Many smokers eligible for lung cancer screening can be reached through tobacco quit lines. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier:NCT02286713

Details

ISSN :
25743805
Volume :
3
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
JAMA Network Open
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........461921a05a3329fece5f6a7fa098bb5c
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.20362