Back to Search Start Over

Inter‐vendor variability and reproducibility of subcostal left ventricular longitudinal strain

Authors :
Sarah Chuzi
Arvind Nishtala
Lua Jafari
Nausheen Akhter
Haydee Ramirez
Fei Fei Gong
Asra Azizuddin
Kimberly Y. Chow
Source :
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging. 37:1669-1678
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2021.

Abstract

Left ventricular longitudinal strain (LVLS) performed using subcostal windows is a novel alternative for patients who require strain imaging but have poor apical windows. We investigated the reproducibility and inter-vendor variability of subcostal LVLS. One hundred and twenty-four echocardiographic studies were analysed from 73 women with early stage HER2-positive breast cancer. Speckle tracking strain was performed offline using EchoPAC and TomTec on subcostal 4-chamber and 3-chamber views to obtain subcostal 4-chamber (SC4_LS) and 3-chamber (SC3_LS) LVLS which was then averaged (SCav_LS). Reproducibility of subcostal single chamber and averaged LVLS were assessed. Measurements between platforms were compared. Strain was reported in absolute magnitude. EchoPAC measurements of SC3_LS (20.5 ± 2.4% vs. 21.2 ± 2.5%, p = 0.002) and SCav_LS (20.9 ± 2.1% vs. 21.2 ± 2.1%, p = 0.02) were lower than TomTec measurements while SC4_LS was similar (21.3 ± 2.7% vs. 21.3 ± 2.5%, p = 0.94). Mean differences between EchoPAC and TomTec were ≤ 0.6% strain units for all subcostal LVLS measurements; SCav_LS showed the narrowest limits of agreement (LOA) (mean difference − 0.3%, LOA − 3.2 to 2.6%). EchoPAC and TomTec measurements of SCav_LS showed good correlation (r = 0.76, p

Details

ISSN :
15730743 and 15695794
Volume :
37
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........435d855ea514bb65c70dbebdf69162d5