Back to Search Start Over

Are polycultures for silage pragmatic medleys or gallimaufries?

Authors :
Armen R. Kemanian
Greg W. Roth
Julie Baniszewski
John F. Tooker
Amanda B. Burton
Source :
Agronomy Journal. 113:1205-1221
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Wiley, 2021.

Abstract

Polycultures, mixtures of different crop species in the same field, may provide both production and ecological benefits. Silage production in annual cropping systems may incorporate polycultures and take advantage of species’ niche partitioning, potentially stabilizing yield variation due to abiotic stress. Using maize (Zea mays L.) silage as the basis of our 3‐year study, we tested the impact on crop and soil attributes of replacing a fraction of maize with soy (Glycine max (L.) Merr.), sorghum (Sorghum bicolor var. bicolor × bicolor and var. sudanense [unnamed hybrid]), or a medley of soy, sorghum, and sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Compared to maize monocultures and on average for the three years, a replacement mixture of maize + soy lowered yields(1.57 vs. 1.87 kg m‐2), but increased the nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and potassium (K) concentration in the silage by 1.2x, 1.09x, and 1.03x, respectively. Maize + sorghum polycultures matched the biomass yields of maize monocultures (1.77 vs. 1.87 kg m‐2) and increased K concentration (10.2 vs. 8.2 g kg‐1). While random forest analysis revealed no change in post‐harvest soil mineral N with depth among treatments, there was a tendency for higher total mineral N left in the soil for soy‐containing vs. sorghum‐containing treatments (12.4 vs. 10.9 g m‐2). Silage polycultures are a feasible alternative to maize silage monocultures and can improve silage nutrient concentration with no yield penalty if maize or sorghum dominate plant stands. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Details

ISSN :
14350645 and 00021962
Volume :
113
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Agronomy Journal
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........3ea53adf8dd2870106d7d02b6ef5bfa5
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/agj2.20602