Back to Search Start Over

A Comparison of Colonoscopy and Double-Contrast Barium Enema for Surveillance after Polypectomy

Authors :
Sidney J. Winawer
Edward T. Stewart
Ann G. Zauber
John H. Bond
Howard Ansel
Jerome D. Waye
Deborah Hall
J. Andrew Hamlin
Melvin Schapiro
Michael J. O'Brien
Stephen S. Sternberg
Walter J. Hogan
Mansho Khilnani
Frederick W. Ackroyd
Joel F. Panish
Larry Kussin
Martin Edelman
Leonard S. Gottlieb
Source :
New England Journal of Medicine. 342:1766-1772
Publication Year :
2000
Publisher :
Massachusetts Medical Society, 2000.

Abstract

Background After patients have undergone colonoscopic polypectomy, it is uncertain whether colonoscopic examination or a barium enema is the better method of surveillance. Methods As part of the National Polyp Study, we offered colonoscopic examination and double-contrast barium enema for surveillance to patients with newly diagnosed adenomatous polyps. Although barium enema was performed first, the endoscopist did not know the results. Results A total of 973 patients underwent one or more colonoscopic examinations for surveillance. In the case of 580 of these patients, we performed 862 paired colonoscopic examinations and barium-enema examinations that met the requirements of the protocol. The findings on barium enema were positive in 222 (26 percent) of the paired examinations, including 94 of the 242 colonoscopic examinations in which one or more adenomas were detected (rate of detection of adenomas, 39 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 33 to 45 percent). The proportion of examinations in which ...

Details

ISSN :
15334406 and 00284793
Volume :
342
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
New England Journal of Medicine
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........3cfc44459b1c468b246ff3e78010fe37
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200006153422401