Fundamental aspiration to the good: Anselm's way

The article investigates internal motives and ways of realization of Anselm of Canterbury’s program fides quaerens intellectum. The author, basing on contemporary lite-rature, strives to reveal the structure of Anselm’s argumentation and to consider the main lines of its up-to-date interpretations. Is the principle sola ratione a choice in favor of a pure rationality? Or, on the contrary, Anselm's rational arguments are internally connected with the orientation of faith? Does Anselm’s thought consider religious experience as the basic condition of thinking? Or it rather goes about universal experience of thinking as the basis of proof of the truths of faith (truths of Revelation)? The author shows the ambiguity of assessments of Anselm’s intellectual heritage. In the article Anselm's argumentation is treated in its unity and dynamics, as a movement of a sole argument (already in "Monolo-gion"). The Benedictine thinker opts for «the most convenient way» of thought – the way of striving for the good, inherent in any person. An advancement on this way allows to reveal the nature of the Highest Good and reveal its main attributes. There is not a purely theoreti-cal research, but rather meditation, intellectual exercise which should lead to certain practic-al consequences. The analysis of this base aspiration opens to us an idea of human destina-tion: the person is called for conscious life which opens the way to true happiness. Faith, rationality and mystical experience are for Anselm various aspects of a single effort which is expressed in the well-known formula fides quaerens intellectum. References Аверинцев С. София-Логос. Словарь. – К.: Дух і літера, 2006. Ансельм Кентерберийский Сочинения. – М.: Канон, 1995. Берман Г. Дж. Западная традиция права: эпоха формирования. – М.: Норма, 1998. Гайденко В. Ансельм Кентерберийский. // Католическая энциклопедия в четырех томах. Том 1. – М.: Издательство Францисканцев, 2002. – С. 266–269. Дейвіс Б. Вступ до філософії релігії. – К.: Основи, 1996. Декарт Р. Метафізичні розмисли. – К.: Юніверс, 2000. Європейський словник філософій. Лексикон неперекладностей. Том другий. – К.: Дух і літера, 2011. Жильсон Э. Философия в средние века. От истоков патристики до конца XIV века. – М.: Республика, 2004. Коплстон Ф.Ч. История средневековой философии. – М.: Энигма, 1997. Памятники средневековой латинской литературы X – XII веков. – М.: Наука, 1972. Adams M. Anselm on faith and reason // The Cambridge Companion to Anselm / (Еd.) Davies Brian and Brian Leftow. – Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2004. Anselm Basic Writings. Edited and Translated by Thomas Williams. – Indianapo-lis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company, Inc., 2007. Anselm of Canterbury The major works / Edited with an Introduction by Brian Davies and G.R. Evans. – Oxford: Oxford UP, 1998. Anselmo Monologion / Introduzione, traduzione, note e apparati di Italo Sciuto. – Milano: Rusconi Libri, 1995. Balthasar H.U. von Chwala. Estetyka teologiczna. Tom 2. Modele teologiczne. Cześc 1. Od Ireneusza do Bonawentury. – Krakow: WAM, 2007. Flasch K. Das philosophische Denken im Mittelalter. Von Augustin zu Machiavelli. Stutt-gart: Reclam, 1995. Flasch K. Kampfplatze der Philosophie. Grose Kontroversen von Augustin bis Voltaire. – Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 2008. Gersh S. John Scottus Eriugena and Anselm of Canterbury // Routledge History of Philoso-phy. Volume III. Medieval Philosophy. Edited by John Marenbon. – London and New York: Routledge, 1998. – P. 120–149. Gilbert P.P. Wprowadzenie do teologii średniowiecza. – Krakow: WAM, 1997. Grzesik T. Anzelm z Canterbury. – Warszawa: Wiedza powszechna, 2004. Heinzmann R. Anselm von Canterbury // Heinrich Fries, Georg Kretschmar (Hrsg.). Klassi-ker der Theologie I. – Munchen: C.H.Beck, 1981. – S. 165–180. Heinzmann R. Filozofia średniowiecza. – Kety: Wydawnictwo Antyk, 1999. Henrich D. Der ontologische Gottesbeweis. Sein Problem und seine Geschichte in der Neuzeit. – Tubingen: J.C.B.Mohr (Paul Siebeck), 1960. Hindrichs G. Das Absolute und das Subjekt. Untersuchung zum Verhaltnis von Metaphy-sik und Nachmetaphysik. – Frankfurt am Main: Vittorio Klostermann, 2008. Liebeschutz H. Anselm of Canterbury: the philosophical interpretation of faith // The Cambridge History of Later Greek and early medieval Philosophy. Edited by A.H. Armstrong. – Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2008. – P. 611–642. Loffler W. Anselm von Canterbury – Das ontologische Argument fur Gottes Existenz // Klassiker der Philosophie heute. Herausgegeben von Ansgar Beckermann und Dominik Perler. – Stuttgart: Reclam, 2005. – S. 121–142. Mojsisch B. Anselm von Canterbury. Gottesbeweise // Theo Kobusch (Hrsg.). Philosophen des Mittelalters. – Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, 2000. – S. 42–53. Onofrio G. D’. Historia teologii II. Epoka średniowieczna. – Krakow: Wydawnictwo M, 2005. Plantinga A.C. Bog, wolnośc i zlo. – Znak: Krakow, 1995. Plantinga A. (ed.) The Ontological Argument. – Garden City, NY: Anchor Books, 1965. Rod W. Der Gott der reinen Vernunft. Die Auseinandersetzung um den ontologischen Gottesbeweis von Anselm bis Hegel. – Munchen: Beck, 1992. Schmitt F.S. Anselm of Canterbury // New Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. 1. – Washington: The Catholic UP of America, 2003. – P. 495–497. Schrimpf G. Bausteine fur einen historischen Begriff der scholastischen Philosophie // Philosophie im Mittelalter. Entwicklungslinien und Paradigmen. Herausgegeben von Jan P. Beckmann, Ludger Honnefelder, Gangolf Schrimpf und Georg Wieland. – Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag, 1987. – S. 1–25. Viola C.E. Anzelm z Aosty. Wiara i szukanie zrozumienia. – Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL, 2009. Visser S. & Williams T. Anselm. – Oxford: Oxford UP, 2009.