Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of API 510 pressure vessels inspection planning with API 581 risk-based inspection planning approaches

Authors :
Mohammad Shishesaz
Elahe Shekari
Seyed Javad Hashemi
Mohammad Nazarnezhad Bajestani
Source :
International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping. :202-208
Publication Year :
2013
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2013.

Abstract

To ensure mechanical integrity, all pressure vessels shall be inspected at the intervals provided in inspection codes or based on a risk-based inspection (RBI) assessment. The RBI assessment may allow previously established inspection intervals to be extended. This paper describes the methodology, analysis and results of two RBI studies conducted on 293 pressure vessel components in two crude oil distillation units. Based on API RBI methodology in API 581 (2008), risk target concept was used for determining inspection dates. It was shown that when thinning is the major active damage, the RBI recommended intervals are as long as twice the API 510 intervals. This paper summarizes that, as a fundamental step in the risk calculation, RBI has a more defined methodology for evaluating equipment for multiple damage mechanisms and a more defined approach to specify the use of other inspection technologies beyond the traditional visual, ultrasonic, and radiography tests.

Details

ISSN :
03080161
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........367123bc855d841564db90570c09a8c2
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpvp.2013.07.007