Back to Search Start Over

Canola Meal Compared with Urea in a Barley and Potato Processing Residue Finishing Diet for Feedlot Steers1231Idaho Agric. Exp. Stn. Manuscript No. 98A19.2The authors gratefully acknowledge the Canola Council of Canada for partial support of this research.3Reference to brand or trade names does not indicate or imply an endorsement of the product or representation that comparable products may not be available

Authors :
S.J. Sorensen
K. Coffey
D. D. Hinman
P.A. Momont
L. Spiece
J.R. Males
C.J. Kercher
Source :
The Professional Animal Scientist. 15:191-195
Publication Year :
1999
Publisher :
American Registry of Professional Animal Scientists, 1999.

Abstract

Five combinations of canola meal and urea were compared in a titration study using yearling beef steers (n = 120, initial weight = 383 kg ± 6.25) consuming barley and potato processing residue-based diets. The steers were allotted to 20 pens in a randomized block design and fed for 86 d. Diets were formulated to contain 30% potato processing residue, 45% barley, 15% corn silage, and 10% supplement (DM basis). Nitrogen source was the only difference in the diets. Supplements were formulated to be isonitrogenous with the N source being either urea or canola meal (C) to provide a calculated dietary CP of 11.5%. Treatments were: 100% urea supplement (0C); 25% canola meal supplement, 75% urea supplement (25C); 50% canola meal supplement, 50% urea supplement (50C); 75% canola meal supplement, 25% urea supplement (75C); and 100% canola meal supplement (100C). Average daily gain and DMI were similar for all treatments (P>0.05). Gain to feed ratio was larger (P 0.05). The changes in carcass composition toward a leaner carcass with natural protein (the 25C fed steers) indicate potential benefits from the use of canola meal in barley and potato processing residue-based diets instead of urea as the sole supplemental N source.

Details

ISSN :
10807446
Volume :
15
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Professional Animal Scientist
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........31f91aecf9fcec579e58ca966b7a6b65
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.15232/s1080-7446(15)31757-5