Back to Search Start Over

The primary care provider (PCP)-cancer specialist relationship: A systematic review and mixed-methods meta-synthesis

Authors :
Michael D. Fetters
Gwendolyn P. Quinn
M. Catherine Lee
Arden M. Morris
Lesly A. Dossett
Janella Hudson
Richard G. Roetzheim
Source :
CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians. 67:156-169
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
Wiley, 2016.

Abstract

Although they are critical to models of coordinated care, the relationship and communication between primary care providers (PCPs) and cancer specialists throughout the cancer continuum are poorly understood. By using predefined search terms, the authors conducted a systematic review of the literature in 3 databases to examine the relationship and communication between PCPs and cancer specialists. Among 301 articles identified, 35 met all inclusion criteria and were reviewed in-depth. Findings from qualitative, quantitative, and disaggregated mixed-methods studies were integrated using meta-synthesis. Six themes were identified and incorporated into a preliminary conceptual model of the PCP-cancer specialist relationship: 1) poor and delayed communication between PCPs and cancer specialists, 2) cancer specialists' endorsement of a specialist-based model of care, 3) PCPs' belief that they play an important role in the cancer continuum, 4) PCPs' willingness to participate in the cancer continuum, 5) cancer specialists' and PCPs' uncertainty regarding the PCP's oncology knowledge/experience, and 6) discrepancies between PCPs and cancer specialists regarding roles. These data indicate a pervasive need for improved communication, delineation, and coordination of responsibilities between PCPs and cancer specialists. Future interventions aimed at these deficiencies may improve patient and physician satisfaction and cancer care coordination. CA Cancer J Clin 2017;67:156-169. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Details

ISSN :
00079235
Volume :
67
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........3196bb02248ab72e632fe657a42ac9f8
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21385