Back to Search
Start Over
Viewing-as explanations and ontic dependence
- Source :
- Philosophical Studies. 177:769-792
- Publication Year :
- 2018
- Publisher :
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2018.
-
Abstract
- According to a widespread view in metaphysics and philosophy of science (the “Dependence Thesis”), all explanations involve relations of ontic dependence between the items appearing in the explanandum and the items appearing in the explanans. I argue that a family of mathematical cases, which I call “viewing-as explanations”, are incompatible with the Dependence Thesis. These cases, I claim, feature genuine explanations that aren’t supported by ontic dependence relations. Hence the thesis isn’t true in general. The first part of the paper defends this claim and discusses its significance. The second part of the paper considers whether viewing-as explanations occur in the empirical sciences, focusing on the case of so-called fictional models (such as Bohr’s model of the atom). It’s sometimes suggested that fictional models can be explanatory even though they fail to represent actual worldly dependence relations. Whether or not such models explain, I suggest, depends on whether we think scientific explanations necessarily give information relevant to intervention and control. Finally, I argue that counterfactual approaches to explanation also have trouble accommodating viewing-as cases.
- Subjects :
- Philosophy of mind
Counterfactual thinking
Philosophy of science
05 social sciences
Metaphysics
06 humanities and the arts
0603 philosophy, ethics and religion
050105 experimental psychology
Epistemology
Mathematical practice
Philosophy of language
Philosophy
060302 philosophy
Ontic
0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
Control (linguistics)
Psychology
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 15730883 and 00318116
- Volume :
- 177
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Philosophical Studies
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi...........2deae746f2e84049170de58d56fff614