Back to Search Start Over

Qualitative Differences between Two Methods of Ethics Education: Focus Group Results

Authors :
Colleen Suratt
Kristina Johnson
Ethan Seville
Toby Schonfeld
Jennifer Goedken
Source :
Ethics and Social Welfare. 9:240-254
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
Informa UK Limited, 2015.

Abstract

Ethics and professionalism standards are essential components of health and welfare training programs, yet data on effective ethics training methods remain elusive. We studied two different delivery methods of ethics education in the Gynecology and Obstetrics rotation of medical school: case-based instructor-facilitated discussion only and case-based discussion following student-led presentations. This paper describes results of the focus group we held with student participants from both methods. Students participated in a mixed 1-hour focus group. The focus group moderator transcribed the meeting, which became the data for the analysis. The research team analyzed the data using grounded theory. Two themes emerged from the data: (1) the ways in which students progressed in their ability to identify and assess ethical questions and (2) the degree to which students were engaged with the course material, peers, and facilitators. In addition, two main categories emerged from overlap among the codes identified...

Details

ISSN :
17496543 and 17496535
Volume :
9
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Ethics and Social Welfare
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........276eb90f520c0e2517a74db64eef6917
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1080/17496535.2015.1023737