Back to Search Start Over

Alteplase Compared to Tenecteplase in patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke (AcT) Trial: Protocol for a Pragmatic Registry linked Randomized Clinical Trial

Authors :
Tolulope Sajobi
Nishita Singh
Mohammed A. Almekhlafi
Brian Buck
Ayoola Ademola
Shelagh B. Coutts
Yan Deschaintre
Houman Khosravani
Ramana Appireddy
Francois Moreau
Stephen Phillips
Gord Gubitz
Aleksander Tkach
Luciana Catanese
Dar Dowlatshahi
George Medvedev
Jennifer Mandzia
Aleksandra Pikula
J.J. Shankar
Heather Williams
Thalia S. Field
Alejandro Manosalva
Muzaffar Siddiqui
Atif Zafar
Oje Imoukhoude
Gary Hunter
Arshia Sehgal
Qiao Zhang
Craig Doram
Michael D. Hill
Michel Shamy
Carol Kenney
Richard H. Swartz
Bijoy K. Menon
Source :
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology.
Publication Year :
2022
Publisher :
Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health), 2022.

Abstract

Background : Intravenous thrombolysis with alteplase is widely used in acute ischemic stroke patients presenting early after symptom onset. Recent phase II trials have suggested that intravenous tenecteplase may be safer and associated with higher early reperfusion rates as compared to alteplase. This study investigates whether intravenous tenecteplase is non‐inferior to intravenous alteplase for the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Methods : This is a pragmatic, registry‐linked, prospective, randomized (1:1) controlled, open‐label parallel group clinical trial with blinded endpoint assessment of 1600 patients to test if intravenous tenecteplase (0.25 mg/kg body weight, max dose 25 mg) is non‐inferior to intravenous alteplase (0.9 mg/kg body weight, max dose 90 mg) in patients with acute ischemic stroke eligible for intravenous thrombolysis in clinical routine. Patients are recruited from comprehensive and primary stroke centers and enrolled using deferral of consent. The proposed sample has at least 90% power with a non‐inferiority margin of 5%, assuming incidence of 90‐day mRS 0–1 is 38% in the tenecteplase and 35% in the alteplase groups, and a loss to follow‐up rate < 5%. Results : The blinded primary endpoint is the proportion of subjects achieving a 90‐day mRS (modified Rankin scale) of 0–1. Key safety outcomes include 24‐hour symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage and 90‐day all‐cause mortality. All serious adverse events within 24‐hour period will be reported and coded using MedDRA. Outcomes are collected either centrally (primary, key secondary and safety endpoints) or through ongoing Canadian stroke registries. The primary analysis is a simple unadjusted comparison of proportions. Conclusion : Results from the trial will provide real‐world evidence of the effectiveness of intravenous tenecteplase vs. alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke presenting early after stroke onset. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT03889249 https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03889249 This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved

Details

ISSN :
26945746
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Stroke: Vascular and Interventional Neurology
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........26d21b0702bb593ee8b7777decea5822