Foam or spray application of agricultural chemicals to clean and disinfect layer cages

SUMMARY A rapid and effective means to clean and disinfect premises is needed by the poultry industry. We hypothesized that commercially available foaming disinfectants and cleaners applied via a compressed air foam system (CAFS) may be used to significantly reduce aerobic bacteria in a commercial caged layer complex. Six field trials were conducted to evaluate current industry cleaning and disinfection protocols and the proposed CAFS application. A commercially available chlorinated alkaline foaming cleaner (CHL/ALK) was applied in trials 1 and 2 by CAFS to one half of the house, and the other half of the house was not treated. The entire house was then washed with a high-pressure water rinse (HPWR). A commercially available peroxyacetic acid (PAA) in trials 3 and 4 or a 14% glutaraldehyde (HI GLUT)/2.5% quaternary ammonia (QAC) blended disinfectant in trials 5 and 6 was applied by CAFS to one half of a washed house. The remainder of the house was then treated with a 7% glutaraldehyde (LO GLUT)/26% QAC, which was spray-applied to cages by the integrator. Environmental swabs of drinker cups and cage floors were collected pre- and post-treatment to determine if aerobic bacteria were reduced. The HPWR and the CHL/ALK treatments did not consistently reduce bacteria on treated surfaces. Significant differences were observed with each of the CAFS applications of the PAA product, resulting in bacterial reductions of 1.83 to 2.27 log10 cfu/sample. Although inconsistent, differences (P