Back to Search
Start Over
LI-RADS v2018: how to appropriately use ancillary features in category adjustment from intermediate probability of malignancy (LR-3) to probably HCC (LR-4) on gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI
- Source :
- European Radiology. 32:46-55
- Publication Year :
- 2021
- Publisher :
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2021.
-
Abstract
- To determine the appropriate use of ancillary features (AFs) in upgrading LI-RADS category 3 (LR-3) to category 4 (LR-4) for hepatic nodules on gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI. We retrospectively analyzed MRI features of solid hepatic nodules (≤ 30 mm) categorized as LR-3/4 on gadoxetic acid–enhanced MRI. In LI-RADS diagnostic table-based-LR-3 observations, logistic regression analyses were performed to identify AFs suggestive of hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) rather than non-malignant nodules. Using McNemar’s test, the sensitivities and specificities of the final-LR-4 category for HCC diagnosis were compared according to the principles of AF application in category adjustment. A total of 336 hepatic nodules (191 HCCs; 145 non-malignant) in 252 patients were evaluated. Based on major HCC features, 248 nodules (123 HCCs) were assigned as table-based-LR-3 and 88 nodules (68 HCCs) as table-based-LR-4. In table-based-LR-3 observations, mild–moderate T2 hyperintensity was identified as an independent predictor of HCC as opposed to non-malignant nodules (odds ratio = 3.01, p = 0.002). For HCC diagnosis, different criteria of final-LR-4: only table-based-LR-4, allowing category upgrade using only T2 hyperintensity, or using any AFs favoring malignancy resulted in sensitivities of 35.6% (68/191), 53.9% (103/191), and 88.5% (169/191), and specificities of 86.2% (125/145), 75.9% (110/145), and 21.4% (31/145), respectively, which differed from each other (all p < 0.001). While the application of MRI AF in LI-RADS category adjustment increases the sensitivity of LR-4 category for HCC diagnosis, it is accompanied by a significant decrease in specificity. Mild–moderate T2 hyperintensity, a significant AF indicative of HCC, may be more appropriate for upgrading LR-3 to LR-4. • When upgrading from LR-3 to LR-4 using any MRI ancillary features favoring malignancy, LR-4 sensitivity increases but specificity decreased for HCC diagnosis. • By upgrading LR-3 to LR-4 based on MRI ancillary features found to suggest HCC rather than non-malignant nodules in multivariate analysis (i.e., mild–moderate T2 hyperintensity), LR-4 demonstrated a more balanced sensitivity and specificity for HCC diagnosis (53.9% and 75.9%, respectively).
- Subjects :
- Gadoxetic acid
medicine.medical_specialty
medicine.diagnostic_test
business.industry
Magnetic resonance imaging
General Medicine
Odds ratio
medicine.disease
Malignancy
digestive system diseases
Hyperintensity
030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
McNemar's test
030220 oncology & carcinogenesis
Hepatocellular carcinoma
medicine
Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging
Radiology
business
medicine.drug
Neuroradiology
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 14321084 and 09387994
- Volume :
- 32
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- European Radiology
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi...........23308d162b0384fd0d557b1a9e908b6c