Back to Search Start Over

Morphology, morphometrics and taxonomy

Authors :
Joanne Harding
Colin P. Groves
Publication Year :
2011
Publisher :
Cambridge University Press, 2011.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Fieldworkers are often unaware of the value of making accurate records of their study animals' morphology. External morphology includes measurements, observations of glandular activity and detailed description of the pelage; internal morphology may include skull and postcranial measurements, recording of suture closure, epiphyseal fusion, dental eruption and wear, and observations on the gut. All these observations will yield information on taxonomy, age–sex class (Table 9.1), reproductive status, individual variation, growth, development, sexual dimorphism and so on. It may also be interesting to look at individuals' behaviour in the light of their external differences: does facial coloration correlate with behaviour in mandrills ( Mandrillus sphinx ), does flange development correlate with behaviour in orangutans ( Pongo spp.), and so on? Measurements may be made either on dead specimens, or on living animals when they are captured (Chapter 7) and, preferably, anaesthetized (Chapter 8). Valuable descriptive information, other than measurements, can be gathered from simple observations, or from photographs (Chapter 17). On occasion, measurements can even be made in this way. For example, Markham and Groves (1990) cite a personal communication from Herman Rijksen of how he weighed four wild orangutans (worth repeating here because it is such a wonderful example of lateral thinking) ‘… by “measuring” the bending arc of particular branches when supporting the full weight of the animal and hoisting up buckets of sand to match the same arc’.

Details

Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........224aa9b5e309f8d87a4f934f6f289754