Back to Search Start Over

Numerical simulation and constructal design applied to plates with different heights of traverse and longitudinal stiffeners

Authors :
Luiz Alberto Oliveira Rocha
Liércio André Isoldi
Vinícius Torres Pinto
Carolina Martins Nogueira
Elizaldo Domingues dos Santos
Source :
Engineering Solid Mechanics. :221-238
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Growing Science, 2021.

Abstract

Martins Nogueira, Vinícius Torres Pinto, Luiz Alberto Oliveira Rocha, Elizaldo Domingues dos Santos and Liércio André Isoldi Right click to download the paper PDF (550K) Abstract: This study applied the Constructal Design Method (CDM) associated with the Finite Element Method (FEM) through computational models to perform a geometric analysis on rectangular stiffened plates of steel subjected to a uniform transverse loading, in order to minimize its maximum and central out-of-plane deflections. Considering a non-stiffened plate as reference and maintaining the total volume of steel constant, a portion of material volume deducted from its thickness was transformed into stiffeners through the ϕ parameter, which represents the ratio between the material volume of the stiffeners and the reference plate. Adopting ϕ = 0.30, 27 geometric arrangements of stiffened plates were established, being 9 arrangements for each 3 different stiffeners' thicknesses adopted: ts = 6.35 mm, ts = 12.70 mm and ts = 25.40 mm. For each ts value, the number of longitudinal (Nls) and transverse (Nts) stiffeners were varied from 2 to 4. Thus, in each plate arrangement configured, the influence of the ratio between the height of the transverse and longitudinal stiffeners (hts/hls) was analyzed, taking into account the values 0.50; 0.75; 1.00; 1.25; 1.50; 1.75 and 2.00, regarding to the maximum and central deflections. The results have shown that transforming a portion of steel from a non-stiffened reference plate into stiffeners can reduce the maximum and central deflections by more than 90%. Moreover, it was observed that to reduce the deflections it is more effective consider hts > hls, once the ratio hts/hls = 2.00 was the one that led to the better mechanical behavior among the analyzed cases.

Details

ISSN :
22918752 and 22918744
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Engineering Solid Mechanics
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........1faff9779e37f4e99849226295420d67
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.5267/j.esm.2020.12.001